Posted on 10/13/2016 8:10:21 AM PDT by ChessExpert
Economists from Moodys Analytics write articles saying that Hillarys economic policies are better for the economy than Trumps policies. These articles come can come from Mark Zandi, Don White or in this case, Jeff Benjamin. Whenever any article comes from Moody's analytics a footnote should show that a major shareholder of Moody's is Warren Buffett who campaigns for Hillary. The image they project is that Moody's is an objective, independent source. Zandi is always trotted out as the independent economist whenever Obama or Hillary need an economist to support their policies.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Isn't it amazing that S & P was sued by the Justice Department for $5 Billion for their high ratings on junk mortgages, but Moody's wasnt? It sure helps to be a friend and supporter of Obama doesn't it? All you have to do is support his policies and you won't be punished whether your name is Buffett or Hillary.
Any “economist” that says raising taxes even further would be good for the economy is either lying or dangerously delusional. Either way, he should not be running around lose. He is a danger to self and others.
At some point there simply has to be a price paid for the corruption and lies.
When Trump was talking, during the 2nd debate, about dropping the corporate taxes from 35% to 15%, I was hoping he would explain what we all know - corporations make up for being taxed so heavily by passing the costs on to the consumer which equates a high tax rate for them to actually being a tax on John Q....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.