Jill Stein Demands Donald Trump End ‘Intimidation’ Against Vote Recount Efforts

The New York Observer ^ | December 5, 2016 | Madina Toure

[A_Former_Democrat]

A court should slap that bitch down in no time. She’s wasting everyone’s time, a 1%er who’s doing hilLIARs and Soros dirty work. The only thing “aggrieved” about Stein is her face.

[bk1000]

Getting tired of reading “Jill Stein demands...”. Who the hell is she, anyway, and why should anyone give a rats butt what her demands are. She didn’t even show.

[AFreeBird]

No. just taking money, from Hillary backers, to feather her nest.

She not expecting anything out of this other than money.

[redfreedom]

Considering she’s an unadorned lefty, you are probably not too far from the truth, which would also include unshaved legs and whatever else those nasty old hags from the 60’s do.

[ozzymandus]

It’s really time to ignore this attention-seeking wacko. I saw her ranting at Chris Wallace on FOX, and she’s crazy. Not just a leftie nutjob, but really crazy.

[Pollster1]

That’s why we needed President Trump. If a footnote to the election had made demands of Mitt Romney, our previous nominee would have bowed down and apologized.

[ConservaTeen]

Jill why don’t you stop intimidating the voters who voted for President Trump. Wow, President Trump what a great sounding name.

[GCC Catholic]

The two main Third Party candidates in this cycle give us Exhibits A and B as to why most Americans don't take third parties seriously:

• Gary "What's Aleppo?" Johnson -- washed up pothead Republican who can't be bothered to actually run as a Republican because it might mean he has to do something. He has no mastery of the issues, especially foreign ones. Even his VP candidate thought he was useless, and ended up basically endorsing Hillary.
• Dr. Jill "Every vote counts" Stein -- once the election is over seeks to hinder the will of the people by choosing recounts in states that Trump won that "should have" gone for Hillary, apparently blissfully ignorant of the fact that her presence in the election might have actually denied Hillary several of those states. No mention of any concerns about vote fraud before the election, but can't talk about anything else afterwards; apparently fraud perpetrated by Russian hackers is bad, but fraud by dead voters and illegal immigrant voters is fine. She is in her sixteenth minute of fame -- everything else from here on out is attention-whoring and money-grabbing. She's dangerous only because stupid liberals are taking her seriously.

[tom h]

And, if Trump doesn’t back down, she’ll cry like all of Hillary’s supporters did.

[bgill]

Who’s the one intimidating? The liberals live in an upside down world.

[Secret Agent Man]

Bitches be crazy.

[justa-hairyape]

But nobody in government said anything when there was clear evidence that Hillary stole the nomination. So their concern for democracy is disengenious. As is everything else they do.