Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Name one Green Party member who holds office in the United States.

Exactly. Trump could have simply passed the treaty to the Senate where it would have been immediately swatted down. If he had taken that route the issue would have quietly died out. Trump chose to make a spectacle out of this because he knows the issue works to his advantage. Every poll has shown that Americans think global warming is a fraud.

6 posted on 06/01/2017 6:18:25 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SeeSharp
Trump could have simply passed the treaty to the Senate where it would have been immediately swatted down

No, it wouldn't. They probably would've passed it. One thing we've learned is that a MAJORITY of US Senate Republicans are bought and paid for by global masters who benefit from these schemes. Besides that, they'll do anything to vote against Trump.

Trump was 100% correct to take no chances.

President Trump said in his speech that Obama used State Department money to hand over for the Paris Accords. How sick is that? Money that should've been used to disintegrate ISIS was diverted to "climate change". Really, what's worse for the environment and for the future of mankind on earth than ISIS is?

18 posted on 06/01/2017 6:39:03 PM PDT by grania (only a pawn in their game)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: SeeSharp
Trump could have simply passed the treaty to the Senate where it would have been immediately swatted down.

I'm not as confident of that as many are.

Yes, Kyoto was slapped down almost unanimously, but how long ago was that? 15 years?

Only 22 Republican Senators signed the letter to Trump to withdraw, and I would be willing to bet that every Democrat Senator would now vote to ratify.

They would do it to spite Trump and the "deniers" and they will also do everything they can to try to preserve Obama's pathetic legacy.

Throw in Murkowsky and Collins and and the 15-20 Republican squishes and that puts it too damn close to the 2/3 required to even take that chance..

24 posted on 06/01/2017 6:50:00 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: SeeSharp

‘”Trump could have simply passed the treaty to the Senate where it would have been immediately swatted down”

I must disagree. I think it would get the 67 votes. The pressure and money would have overwhelming. I bet there are 60 votes for it right now they would only have to get about 7 votes. I am just ecstatic Trump kept his promise and l am sorry l doubted him. In so doing has put a solid lock on his base. He resisted pressure from inside and out and l commend him for it. MAGA


27 posted on 06/01/2017 7:09:22 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson