To: Dan from Michigan
What irritates me is the gross ignorance of the anti-gun crowd. The "snipers" used a .223, which is a powerful round, to be sure, but if these anti-gun types were to ever compare it to a common hunting round (I have in mind the .30-.30, .30-.06 and the .300 magnum), they would be astounded. They have no idea of the power of hunting rifles. "Assault weapons" by comparison are kind of puny.
To: OldPossum
The "snipers" used a .223, which is a powerful round, to be sure, but if these anti-gun types were to ever compare it to a common hunting round (I have in mind the .30-.30, .30-.06 and the .300 magnum), they would be astounded. They have no idea of the power of hunting rifles. "Assault weapons" by comparison are kind of puny. I was just looking at this the other day.
It turns out that grandpa's old .30-.06 rifle has more energy at 500 yards that the latest souped-up AR-15 does at the muzzle.
23 posted on
10/13/2003 7:23:29 PM PDT by
Mulder
(Fight the future)
To: OldPossum
"They have no idea of the power of hunting rifles. "Assault weapons" by comparison are kind of puny. "
Oh, yes they do. Regardless of what the anti-gun folks say-- they'll come for our hunting rifles next!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson