Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
I know you didn't mean it, but you are implying what they did was rational. I'm sure we agree that what they think is rational is undermining the RKBA.

Heavens no, I don't think the AWB is in any way rational! All I was trying to say was that the gun grabbers didn't like semi-automatic rifles that look like assault rifles, but couldn't define anything about them that was any different functionally than the "less evil" hunting rifle.

Semi-auto operation? Nope, "legit" hunting rifles are in semi-auto as well. Caliber? Nope, there are sporting rifles in each of the popular calibers. Detachable Magazine? Nope, many sporting rifles have detachable magazines. So the only thing left were flash suppressors, bayonet lugs, etc. to distinguish the "hated" guns from the "barely tolerated - for now" guns.

How many people have been murdered by a flash supressor?

66 posted on 10/14/2003 1:31:28 PM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo
All I was trying to say was that the gun grabbers didn't like semi-automatic rifles that look like assault rifles, but couldn't define anything about them that was any different functionally than the "less evil" hunting rifle.

That's why the proposed law reduces the number of bad features from two to one, along with a removable magazine. However it defines "pistol grip" in such a way as to include most any stock. So the law would effectively ban all semi-autos with removable magazines.

71 posted on 10/14/2003 2:30:52 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson