Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yes, Child Care Crisis Is Real: Mike
NY Daily News ^ | 10.28.2003 | LISA L. COLANGELO and JOANNE WASSERMAN

Posted on 10/29/2003 4:43:58 AM PST by NYC GOP Chick

Yes, child care crisis
is real: Mike

But says city can't afford more programs

Leny Arriola leaves her two teen children and 10-year-old alone after school but desperately needs care for her infant.
When money was cut, so was Adryanna's free care, frustrating mom Karinna Fermin.
Joann Girard is seven months pregnant with twins. Because she missed an appointment with Brooklyn ACS officials when her son was in the hospital, she may be left without child care for the 4-year-old boy.
Mayor Bloomberg conceded yesterday what every New York parent already knows: There's a child care crisis in the city.

"We've got to find other ways to get day care slots," he said. "There's no question that kids in this city - a lot of them, particularly those who aren't lucky enough to have a parent at home during the day - need some supervised activities after school. They would benefit, society would benefit."

The mayor stopped far short of promising more slots, saying the city's budget woes made it difficult to pay for additional day care and after-school programs.

"The issue is really how you pay for it, and that's what we're struggling with," he said.

Bloomberg spoke a day after the Daily News launched its Care for Our Kids campaign. The News revealed that 46,000 city children of the working poor are on a years-long waiting list for spots in subsidized care.

Without care, parents are forced to make desperate choices: leaving children home alone, dropping them off at libraries and malls - even sending them to relatives overseas. The problem is especially acute for single parents.

Recognizing how dire the situation has become, City Hall will hold a day-long summit tomorrow on the issue.

Despite the growing outrage and the long waiting list, a recent audit found more than 2,000 slots going unused at a cost of $17 million.

Part of the problem is the programs are a bureaucratic mess. Navigating the system can be a parent's nightmare.

"It is a challenge to enroll your child in any kind of care in New York City," said City Councilwoman Gale Brewer (D-Manhattan) "We have a hodgepodge of programs."

Six schools in Brewer's upper West Side district were supposed to have after-school programs. So far, however, only two months' worth of funding has been allotted.

That leaves parents like Trisha James, an assistant teacher in Harlem, in big trouble. Her daughter, Folasade, 7, attends Public School 191 at Amsterdam Ave. and 64th St., where she is also enrolled in an after-school program.

But the program will end in November if the funding problem isn't straightened out.

"I would have to tell her to meet me in the library," said James.

Parents looking for day care who venture into the grimy Administration for Children's Services offices in Brooklyn and Manhattan often don't get answers or help.

Parents say they must take days off or give up lunch hours to meet with ACS officials unreachable by phone.

The Independent Budget Office found that while the city received a $100 million increase in state and federal funding for child care between 1999 and 2003, it didn't translate into dramatic increases in slots.

Instead, the city reduced its own contribution - from $226 million in 1999 to $148.6 million in 2004 - for child care for poor, working families. It shifted funds to pay for child care for welfare families.

CASE #1
BUDGET AX

Karinna Fermin was barely scraping by on the $250 she makes a week as a home health aide.

Now she doesn't know how she'll pay the bills.

Because of budget cuts, Fermin's 2-year-old daughter, Adryanna, lost her free slot at an E. 13th St. day care center.

"Right now I make $250 a week, and I spend about $125 a week on baby-sitters," Fermin said yesterday at the Manhattan Administration for Children's Services office.

She's trying to find Adryanna a new day care center, but the process is frustrating.

"It makes you feel like not working and staying at home and getting a check because it seems a lot easier than trying to actually work toward something and having it be almost impossible," she said.

Johnny Dwyer

CASE #2
HARD LABOR

After losing her job as a corporate travel consultant following the 9/11 terror attacks, Leny Arriola thought her biggest challenge would be finding work.

Finding day care has proven a bigger obstacle.

The 35-year-old Brooklyn mom recently notched a part-time job in a gift shop at Kennedy Airport and is taking nursing classes at Kingsborough Community College.

She is reluctantly set to let her older children - ages 14, 13 and 10 - fend for themselves a few hours a day after school.

But she desperately needs someone to watch her month-old daughter, Aiyana.

Arriola said she's gotten the runaround from the Administration for Children's Services. "It shouldn't have to be where you go through all this hoopla to try to get your child in day care," she said.

But, she added, "I have no choice. ... If I stay [unemployed] any longer, then it will be that much harder to get back into the job market."

Johnny Dwyer

CASE #3
SICK SYSTEM

Even before she lost her day care benefits, life was a juggling act for Joann Girard.

Girard, who is seven months pregnant with twins, would leave the house before 5 a.m. to get to her job as a currency clerk with JP Morgan Chase on Long Island.

Her husband would drop their 4-year-old son, Neil, at a Brooklyn day care center in the morning, and she'd race from work to pick up her son by 5 p.m.

But when Neil was hospitalized with an ear infection in September, their fragile child care arrangements collapsed.

The couple missed a routine appointment with the Administration for Children's Services while Neil was hospitalized and now face losing their child care benefits.

"They sent a letter stating that we will be out of the program if we don't [get recertified]. But when you call, there's nobody to speak to," she said.

Rescheduling her appointment has been next to impossible, Girard said. "It's always a machine and they don't get back to you," said Girard, who traveled to the Brooklyn ACS office yesterday even though her doctor has put her on bed rest.

Johnny Dwyer

Calls for help unanswered

By MADELINE BARAN and JOANNE WASSERMAN
DAILY NEWS WRITERS

It can be a full-time job getting child care for kids of the working poor.

The Daily News called the hotlines at the Administration for Children's Services seeking information and encountered what parents have long complained of: Phones that go unanswered. Confusing messages. Seemingly endless busy signals.

A reporter who called the main number, (718) FOR-KIDS, seeking information about child care in Brooklyn, was told to call the Brooklyn ACS child care office.

A call to that office went to an employee's answering machine. A second call to the same number was connected to a confusing, poorly recorded voice-mail message that gave four possible numbers to call.

"Due to the high volume of calls, we apologize in advance if all voice messages are not returned. Good day," the message ended.

In Queens, an ACS employee gave out a number to call. That line was busy for hours.

Calls placed to the Manhattan office also led nowhere. Several times, the phone was busy. Then the phone rang and rang, but no one answered.

A Bronx ACS employee gave out three numbers. There was no answer or a busy signal at those numbers.

Mayor Bloomberg's 311 information line didn't help much either. Told the caller was looking for child care in Brooklyn, the operator gave out a New York State agency number.

When the reporter called upstate, a state employee transferred her to another department where yet another number was given.

An ACS spokeswoman said employees in her office fared better than The News when they did their own test calls to 311. "We can't relate to what you went through," she said.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; US: New York
KEYWORDS: blooomberg; childcare; nyc; socialistparadise
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 10/29/2003 4:43:59 AM PST by NYC GOP Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
What about these people taking a little responsibility for their actions? Maybe not squirting our a litter of kids if they can't care for them?
2 posted on 10/29/2003 4:46:06 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart; Tabi Katz; firebrand; Clemenza; Oschisms; Cacique; NYCVirago
Nice to know Nurse Bloomberg is fixating on something other than smoking in bars...As if this is now our most pressing problem. The economy is down the toilet, we're still under permanent "orange alert" and *this* is where he focuses, even for a while?!

He's going to undo every good thing Giuliani did, and turn this place back into a third world village that belongs in Bangladesh.

3 posted on 10/29/2003 4:47:10 AM PST by NYC GOP Chick (I once tried to think like a democRat, but I couldn't get my head that far up my a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
Nah. You see, that involves actually expecting people to take some responsibility for themselves. And the wrath they bring down on those who suggest that they not whelp these kids if they can't afford the basics. I resent paying for someone else's lifestyle choices.
4 posted on 10/29/2003 4:48:30 AM PST by NYC GOP Chick (I once tried to think like a democRat, but I couldn't get my head that far up my a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
Unfortunately, Bloomberg is also real.
5 posted on 10/29/2003 4:49:33 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
Hey, at least I didn't vote for him!
6 posted on 10/29/2003 4:52:29 AM PST by NYC GOP Chick (I once tried to think like a democRat, but I couldn't get my head that far up my a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
I want MY upper middle class lifestyle!
I want MY right to have as many kids as I want!
I want My career!
I want somebody ELSE to care for my child!
I want somebody ELSE to pay for my day care
I want MY upper middle class lifestyle!
I want it ALL, and I DEMAND that YOU pay for it!
7 posted on 10/29/2003 4:57:36 AM PST by camle (no fool like a damned fool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
I resent paying for someone else's lifestyle choices.

Well said. Why should the consequences for someone else's poor choices and self indulgent lifestyles fall on those of us who bust our buns and sacrifice to pay for ourselves and our families. When the county taxes me more heavily to pay for welfare for health care for the illegal hispanic immigrants who live here that means that I have less money to spend on my family.

8 posted on 10/29/2003 5:01:46 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
I resent paying for someone else's lifestyle choices.

Well said. Why should the consequences for someone else's poor choices and self indulgent lifestyles fall on those of us who bust our buns and sacrifice to pay for ourselves and our families. When the county taxes me more heavily to pay for welfare for health care for the illegal hispanic immigrants who live here that means that I have less money to spend on my family.

9 posted on 10/29/2003 5:06:51 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick

Explain to us, the ignorant taxpayers, just why it is that all these women who can't afford children can expect us to take care of them. Where are the fathers? How many of these people are here illegally (note the reference to sending the children outside the US)? We can't take care of our own children if the govenment taxes us 50% of our paychecks to take care of illegitimate children living in the most expensive city in America.
10 posted on 10/29/2003 5:07:05 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: camle
SO, how long have you been a New Yorker?
11 posted on 10/29/2003 5:08:01 AM PST by NYC GOP Chick (I once tried to think like a democRat, but I couldn't get my head that far up my a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
Well said. Why should the consequences for someone else's poor choices and self indulgent lifestyles fall on those of us who bust our buns and sacrifice to pay for ourselves and our families. When the county taxes me more heavily to pay for welfare for health care for the illegal hispanic immigrants who live here that means that I have less money to spend on my family.

Speaking of illegals, I wonder why NYC pays so much to print up a Voter Guide every fall in English and Spanish -- and then I get another one in the mail, in Korean, due to the high number of Korean-speaking people in my ZIP code.

I thought that speaking English was a requirement of naturalization. And it just chaps my hide every time I got to vote and see the trilingual ballots. If they don't understand enough English to read a ballot and vote, then they don't belong voting.

12 posted on 10/29/2003 5:10:38 AM PST by NYC GOP Chick (I once tried to think like a democRat, but I couldn't get my head that far up my a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
Because they think they're entitled to it all. They don't see it as taking our money to pay for their choices, but as grabbing their own share of the "gubmint money."

There is a serious disconnect for them in that they don't seem to understand that "gubmint money" is nothing more than our money which has been confiscated by politicians pandering to these greedy bastards.

13 posted on 10/29/2003 5:12:17 AM PST by NYC GOP Chick (I once tried to think like a democRat, but I couldn't get my head that far up my a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
This article has schizophrenia.

There are the cries and moans from people who can't afford daycare, then you read this:

Despite the growing outrage and the long waiting list, a recent audit found more than 2,000 slots going unused at a cost of $17 million.

And this:

The Daily News called the hotlines at the Administration for Children's Services seeking information and encountered what parents have long complained of: Phones that go unanswered. Confusing messages. Seemingly endless busy signals.

And this:

Part of the problem is the programs are a bureaucratic mess. Navigating the system can be a parent's nightmare. "It is a challenge to enroll your child in any kind of care in New York City," said City Councilwoman Gale Brewer (D-Manhattan) "We have a hodgepodge of programs."

So, in the end, the problem isn't that the programs and funding aren't there, it's that the programs are a "hodge podge" and that the people running them are incompetent. Yet the solution recommended is to pour more money into the ill-organized programs and hire more incompetent people to manage them. Typically liberal thinking.

14 posted on 10/29/2003 5:17:17 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
I didn't have a vote since I no longer live in NYC, but I was pleased Bloomberg was elected over Green. Now I really don't think it mattered much in terms of damage to the city.
15 posted on 10/29/2003 5:23:35 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
Why were you pleased that he won?!

I was still fuming mad that he bought the nomination and pushed out a true, hardworking Republican -- Herman Badillo. I was pissed that he had contributed big bucks to the likes of Alsnore and was coy about whether he voted for Hitlery. He made a mockery of my party, and then reverted to his limousine liberal roots at the first sign of trouble, and raised taxes in a kneejerk reaction to fiscal trouble.

16 posted on 10/29/2003 5:31:47 AM PST by NYC GOP Chick (I once tried to think like a democRat, but I couldn't get my head that far up my a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
"the problem is especially acute for single parents"

I am sick of paying for peoples bad decisions to have kids when they cannot afford them. Forced tubal ligations and vasectomies should be the rule for those seeking government assistance after one child.
17 posted on 10/29/2003 5:33:07 AM PST by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
Why were you pleased that he won?!

I was mildly pleased ONLY that he won over Green. I have never been pleased with Bloomberg or that he was representing the Republican party. I was merely trying to relate that I thought he would be slightly better than Green, and now I don't even think that.

18 posted on 10/29/2003 5:37:17 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
Green never would have been able to so easily ram a 18.5% real estate tax increase down our throats. Nor would he have single-handedly crippled the bars and restaurants with his anti-smoking jihad.
19 posted on 10/29/2003 5:40:16 AM PST by NYC GOP Chick (I once tried to think like a democRat, but I couldn't get my head that far up my a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
Yep, I agree. As I said, at the time I thought he would be marginally better for the city than Green. I was wrong.
20 posted on 10/29/2003 5:46:39 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson