Skip to comments.
Secret office exaggerated Iraq reports [Google translation]
Zeit via Sueddeutsche ^
| 10/29/2003
Posted on 10/29/2003 10:00:56 AM PST by stck
US Ministry of Defense
Secret office exaggerated Iraq reports
In the Pentagon allegedly reports about Iraq were systematically exaggerated under the direction of vice-president Cheney and sent to the White House. Since August 2002 all Iraq dossiers were provided with prefabricated text modules, reports the Zeit.
The weekly paper for its on Wednesday first published report refers to witnesses from US authorities.
In the so called "Office of Special Plans" of the Pentagon since August 2002 under the direction of vice-president Dick Cheney all dossiers on Iraq were provided with prefabricated text modules, reports a former female employee of the Ministry.
Therein it was called among other things, Saddam Hussein cooperates with Osama bin Laden and has contact with the terrorists of 11th September.
The reports of the special office were submitted not, as otherwise usual, to other US intelligence services for examination, but landed directly in the White House. Main source of the Pentagon department were Iraqi defectors, who themselves had an interest in the fall of Saddam Hussein, as the newspaper reports.
Geheimdienstler [agents] of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), who considered the dossiers of the special office wrong, were pressurized to write politically conformal estimates, reported several former coworkers of the authority.
Other US intelligence services, like those of the foreign and energy Ministry, had contradicted the fright messages from the Rumsfeld Ministry expressly, their representations did not enter into the total analysis about Iraq however. On basis of this total analysis US Congress had agreed of the war.
(sueddeutsche.de/AP)
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Germany; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cheney; cia; iraq; officeofspecialplans; rumsfeld
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
10/29/2003 10:00:56 AM PST
by
stck
To: MJY1288
We have an obvious DUBONICS ATTACK here!
2
posted on
10/29/2003 10:04:35 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
("If you don't like change, you're going to like irrelevance even less.")
To: stck
Trash!
3
posted on
10/29/2003 10:05:27 AM PST
by
Reagan Man
(The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
To: stck
Show me the proof, don't just open your mouth. Do you really think that I would believe you. As far as i'm concerned this is B.S.
4
posted on
10/29/2003 10:06:58 AM PST
by
RobertM
To: Jonah Hex
Please ping the Viking Kitties, we have slithering/slimy/lying/stinking troll on board here.
5
posted on
10/29/2003 10:08:14 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
("If you don't like change, you're going to like irrelevance even less.")
To: RobertM
Frontline did a show on it. It is hardly secret.
6
posted on
10/29/2003 10:08:19 AM PST
by
zippoman
To: RobertM
half of this stuff looks be taken from google and washington post.
7
posted on
10/29/2003 10:08:30 AM PST
by
Pikamax
To: Reagan Man
Ya think ..
8
posted on
10/29/2003 10:09:39 AM PST
by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
To: VRWCmember; Zavien Doombringer; 4mycountry; jriemer; Constitution Day; harpseal
Alert to a DUBONICS ATTACK by a slithering, slimy, smelly, lying Troll.
9
posted on
10/29/2003 10:12:44 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
("If you don't like change, you're going to like irrelevance even less.")
To: stck
The translation is so bad I can't tell what it means.
What is a "pressurized" agent?
I saw Sean Connery in a deep sea suit once.
Lots of accusations are made and not one shred of evidence is presented. Someone needs to have at least a bit of proof when they come on Free Republic and spew trash.
10
posted on
10/29/2003 10:13:41 AM PST
by
xzins
(Proud to be Army!)
To: stck; MeeknMing
11
posted on
10/29/2003 10:17:08 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
("If you don't like change, you're going to like irrelevance even less.")
To: stck
What the hay is this garbage doing in BREAKING NEWS, This is DUBONICS translated in Clintonese
12
posted on
10/29/2003 10:17:55 AM PST
by
MJY1288
(This is your tagline "Bush/Cheney04", this is your tagline on drugs "AnyOtherChoice/04")
To: xzins
The translation is so bad I can't tell what it means.Oh good. Thank you for mentioning that. I thought it was me needing about a gallon of coffee.
13
posted on
10/29/2003 10:18:13 AM PST
by
lysie
To: lysie
It is fairly obvious with this garbage, Homeland Security should investigate this clown to see if his Visa is valid.
If he is here illegally, wrap him up and send him to Gitmo to find out who coordinates this bs.
Of course he could be a result of being exposed to Ebonics and DUbonics instead an education in the Public Schools!
14
posted on
10/29/2003 10:23:58 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
("If you don't like change, you're going to like irrelevance even less.")
To: zippoman
NARRATOR: Four days later, the president and his cabinet gathered at Camp David to formulate strategy in the war on terrorism. President Bush told cabinet members that if Saddam Hussein was to become a target, they needed to dig up evidence that he was cooperating with al Qaeda.
Within days, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz directed one of his deputies, Douglas Feith, to set up a special office inside the Pentagon that would examine the intelligence regarding Iraq's possible connection with al Qaeda.
It started as a small, secretive operation.
RICHARD PERLE: It was very simple. It was clear that no one had been looking for links of a kind that it was reasonable to consider might exist. We didn't know whether they existed, and the evidence might have been that they didn't exist. So some people were brought in to take a look. And within a very short period of time, they began to find links that nobody else had previously understood.
NARRATOR: When it came to Iraq, the special intelligence office didn't trust what the CIA or even their own Defense Intelligence Agency had to say. They did apparently listen to Ahmad Chalabi. According to one Pentagon source, he visited once every other month. Across the Potomac, Greg Thielmann had analyzed intelligence for the State Department for seven years.
GREG THIELMANN, U.S. Dept. of State (1977-02): That office was largely invisible to us in the intelligence community because they didn't-- they didn't play in the-- in the normal bureaucratic process of making intelligence assessments and reporting on those assessments.
MARTIN SMITH: What did you understand that office to be about?
GREG THIELMANN: I am still trying to figure out what that office was about. The office wasn't big enough for them to really have the expertise in-house, and the mere creation of the office was odd, since the secretary of defense had the entire Defense Intelligence Agency at his disposal. So it's a little mysterious what exactly they were doing.
RICHARD PERLE: Let me be blunt about this. The level of competence of the Central Intelligence Agency in this area is appalling. They had filtered out the whole set of possibilities because it was inconsistent with their model. So if you're walking down the street and you're not looking for hidden treasure, you won't find it.
MARTIN SMITH: Conversely, if you look for something, you will find it, simply because you are looking. And the nature of intelligence is -- is very often vague, and things can be interpreted one way or another.
RICHARD PERLE: Of course. There's no absolute truth in this.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/truth/etc/script.html
15
posted on
10/29/2003 10:24:11 AM PST
by
zippoman
To: stck
Who's the source of this blather?
16
posted on
10/29/2003 10:26:01 AM PST
by
m1-lightning
(Lick your fingers and touch two pinball machines at the same time.)
To: lysie
Don't misunderstand me....I love coffee, and it's not fair that you get coffee and I don't...
but that was one lousy translation.
(So...how 'bout some coffee?) :>)
17
posted on
10/29/2003 10:39:06 AM PST
by
xzins
(Proud to be Army!)
To: Pikamax
No, Pika, from the DNC. For heaven's sakes keep your sources straight! V's wife.
18
posted on
10/29/2003 10:45:16 AM PST
by
ventana
To: xzins
The thread title clearly states "Google translation" (look again if you didn't see it). It may suck, but is certainly not too difficult to understand.
19
posted on
10/29/2003 10:48:58 AM PST
by
stck
To: stck
Yep, it sucks AND it loses something in translation.
So there ya have it....my opinion.
Backed up by just as must fact as this article.
20
posted on
10/29/2003 10:50:54 AM PST
by
xzins
(Proud to be Army!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson