Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth
That's my point. Anybody can point to a fringe element and say "See, that guy is nasty so all people who belong to a group he claims to belong to are nasty."

But look at the modern paleocon movement. I really don't see any professional writer who's a paleocon who doesn't at least have a tinge of anti-Semitism.

Reese, Sobran, Buchanan, even the goofs at antiwar.com. Whatever the paleocon movement may have been, these people define it today.

82 posted on 10/30/2003 9:12:29 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: AmishDude
But look at the modern paleocon movement. I really don't see any professional writer who's a paleocon who doesn't at least have a tinge of anti-Semitism.

Strictly speaking, it is not anti-semitism to be opposed to some of Israel's policies. Israel has made some terrific blunders in very recent times.

And to be fair to Paleo's, it's much more that they are anti-interventionist than it is that they are anti-Israel.

90 posted on 10/30/2003 9:19:29 AM PST by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999 !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: AmishDude
I really don't see any professional writer who's a paleocon who doesn't at least have a tinge of anti-Semitism.
Robert Locke, Jim Kalb, Lawrence Auster, Matthew Alexander, Paul Gottfried, Srdj Trifkovic come to mind as non anti-Semites.
143 posted on 10/30/2003 10:59:56 AM PST by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson