To: Sabertooth
That's my point. Anybody can point to a fringe element and say "See, that guy is nasty so all people who belong to a group he claims to belong to are nasty."
But look at the modern paleocon movement. I really don't see any professional writer who's a paleocon who doesn't at least have a tinge of anti-Semitism.
Reese, Sobran, Buchanan, even the goofs at antiwar.com. Whatever the paleocon movement may have been, these people define it today.
To: AmishDude
But look at the modern paleocon movement. I really don't see any professional writer who's a paleocon who doesn't at least have a tinge of anti-Semitism.Strictly speaking, it is not anti-semitism to be opposed to some of Israel's policies. Israel has made some terrific blunders in very recent times.
And to be fair to Paleo's, it's much more that they are anti-interventionist than it is that they are anti-Israel.
90 posted on
10/30/2003 9:19:29 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999 !!!!)
To: AmishDude
I really don't see any professional writer who's a paleocon who doesn't at least have a tinge of anti-Semitism.
Robert Locke, Jim Kalb, Lawrence Auster, Matthew Alexander, Paul Gottfried, Srdj Trifkovic come to mind as non anti-Semites.
143 posted on
10/30/2003 10:59:56 AM PST by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson