To: blam; farmfriend
No scientist would ever use such an ignorant term as "human evolution."
Evolution is not science, it is the ignorant religion of the God haters. Objective science proves that creation is undeniable fact.
11 posted on
11/03/2003 8:26:43 PM PST by
editor-surveyor
( . Best policy RE: Environmentalists, - ZERO TOLERANCE !!)
To: editor-surveyor
Evolution is not science, it is the ignorant religion of the God haters. Objective science proves that creation is undeniable fact.Evolution is science. Biologists refer to human evolution frequently. Christians who understand biology don't have a problem with this theory.
It is those folks who demand that science be curtailed are the God-haters. I know you don't have a dinosaur in your basement, or are in possession of a 12 billion year-old human fossil.
However, I agree that creation is a fact.
To: editor-surveyor
When you study on both sides of that belief, you find that they both support each other. Both religion and science has change, evolution, or whatever you want to call it in the same order.
For me I beleive in both concepts in the same way I beleave in heaven and hell. When I die, I am going to be very disappointed to find out no one was keeping score all along because I missed out on a lot of fun trying to follow the Ten Commandments.
17 posted on
11/03/2003 8:39:59 PM PST by
U S Army EOD
(Just plain Wootten)
To: editor-surveyor
ignorant religion - Objective science I have edited your post for clarity.
19 posted on
11/03/2003 8:42:38 PM PST by
WackyKat
To: editor-surveyor
No scientist would ever use such an ignorant term as "human evolution." That's going to come as a big surprise to the scientists who publish and submit articles to scientific journals such as:
...or those scientists who publish such papers as:
Tracing the LINEs of human evolution (Igor Ovchinnikov, Adrienne Rubin, and Gary D. Swergold) [Excellent paper]A Review of Sexual Selection and Human Evolution: How Mate Choice shaped Human Nature
Alu Insertion Polymorphisms and Human Evolution: Evidence for a Larger Population Size in Africa (Mark Stoneking, Jennifer J. Fontius, Stephanie L. Clifford, Himla Soodyall, Santosh S. Arcot, Nilmani Saha, Trefor Jenkins, Mohammad A. Tahir, Prescott L. Deininger, and Mark A. Batzer)
Human evolution: Sex-specific contributions to genome variation (Todd R. Disotell)
Population Bottlenecks and Pleistocene Human Evolution (John Hawks, Keith Hunley, Sang-Hee Lee, and Milford Wolpoff)
Transitions in human evolution and faunal changes during the Pleistocene in Latium (Central Italy) (G. Manzi1, M.R. Palombo, L. Caloi, F. Mallegni)
And so on and so on.
Evolution is not science,
Of course it is, but you're welcome to try to offer an argument why you think it isn't, if you actually have one.
it is the ignorant religion of the God haters.
That's going to come as a big surprise to the millions of Christians who accept evolution.
Objective science proves that creation is undeniable fact.
Ooh, this ought to be interesting -- why don't you provide us some specific examples of the "objective science" which "proves" that creation is an "undeniable fact"?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson