Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam; farmfriend
No scientist would ever use such an ignorant term as "human evolution."

Evolution is not science, it is the ignorant religion of the God haters. Objective science proves that creation is undeniable fact.

11 posted on 11/03/2003 8:26:43 PM PST by editor-surveyor ( . Best policy RE: Environmentalists, - ZERO TOLERANCE !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
Evolution is not science, it is the ignorant religion of the God haters. Objective science proves that creation is undeniable fact.

Evolution is science. Biologists refer to human evolution frequently. Christians who understand biology don't have a problem with this theory.

It is those folks who demand that science be curtailed are the God-haters. I know you don't have a dinosaur in your basement, or are in possession of a 12 billion year-old human fossil.

However, I agree that creation is a fact.

16 posted on 11/03/2003 8:38:17 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor
When you study on both sides of that belief, you find that they both support each other. Both religion and science has change, evolution, or whatever you want to call it in the same order.

For me I beleive in both concepts in the same way I beleave in heaven and hell. When I die, I am going to be very disappointed to find out no one was keeping score all along because I missed out on a lot of fun trying to follow the Ten Commandments.
17 posted on 11/03/2003 8:39:59 PM PST by U S Army EOD (Just plain Wootten)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor
ignorant religion - Objective science

I have edited your post for clarity.

19 posted on 11/03/2003 8:42:38 PM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor
No scientist would ever use such an ignorant term as "human evolution."

That's going to come as a big surprise to the scientists who publish and submit articles to scientific journals such as:

...or those scientists who publish such papers as:

Tracing the LINEs of human evolution (Igor Ovchinnikov, Adrienne Rubin, and Gary D. Swergold) [Excellent paper]

A Review of Sexual Selection and Human Evolution: How Mate Choice shaped Human Nature

Alu Insertion Polymorphisms and Human Evolution: Evidence for a Larger Population Size in Africa (Mark Stoneking, Jennifer J. Fontius, Stephanie L. Clifford, Himla Soodyall, Santosh S. Arcot, Nilmani Saha, Trefor Jenkins, Mohammad A. Tahir, Prescott L. Deininger, and Mark A. Batzer)

Human evolution: Sex-specific contributions to genome variation (Todd R. Disotell)

Population Bottlenecks and Pleistocene Human Evolution (John Hawks, Keith Hunley, Sang-Hee Lee, and Milford Wolpoff)

Transitions in human evolution and faunal changes during the Pleistocene in Latium (Central Italy) (G. Manzi1, M.R. Palombo, L. Caloi, F. Mallegni)

And so on and so on.

Evolution is not science,

Of course it is, but you're welcome to try to offer an argument why you think it isn't, if you actually have one.

it is the ignorant religion of the God haters.

That's going to come as a big surprise to the millions of Christians who accept evolution.

Objective science proves that creation is undeniable fact.

Ooh, this ought to be interesting -- why don't you provide us some specific examples of the "objective science" which "proves" that creation is an "undeniable fact"?

26 posted on 11/03/2003 9:40:46 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson