Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ameribbean expat
Personally, I think modifying the senate rules would not necessarily be a good thing. Sure, it would take a lot of testosterone and all, but would it hurt them any more than it hurts us, in the long run?

The article itself mentions that option, and the downside. I definetly think that this is a better option to go with for now. I'm of the opinion that you don't go "nuclear" until you've exhausted all other conventional measures. This was a "conventional" measure that hadn't been tried. If this doesn't work, then there'll be a whole lot more popular support if and when the nuclear option IS tried later, because many more swing voters would agree that everything else had been tried.

Qwinn
9 posted on 11/13/2003 12:06:41 PM PST by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Qwinn; 1Mike; 3catsanadog; ~Vor~; ~Kim4VRWC's~; A CA Guy; A Citizen Reporter; abner; Aeronaut; ...
Well, lookie here: we made the news again!
10 posted on 11/13/2003 12:07:34 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Qwinn
Personally, I think modifying the senate rules would not necessarily be a good thing. Sure, it would take a lot of testosterone and all, but would it hurt them any more than it hurts us, in the long run? The article itself mentions that option, and the downside. I definetly think that this is a better option to go with for now. I'm of the opinion that you don't go "nuclear" until you've exhausted all other conventional measures. This was a "conventional" measure that hadn't been tried. If this doesn't work, then there'll be a whole lot more popular support if and when the nuclear option IS tried later, because many more swing voters would agree that everything else had been tried. Qwinn

From a political point of view, the Democrats have handed the Republicans a big stick with which to beat them with. It's clear a the moment that the Democrats are obstructionists, but if the Republicans engage the nuclear option, they burn their nice big stick, and in turn hand the Democrats a nice big stick with which to beat them with. The Republicans would then be accused of tyranny of the majority, and unfairness etc.

Personally, I prefer to use the nice big stick until all that's left of it is tooth picks.

68 posted on 11/13/2003 4:42:26 PM PST by Eagle74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Qwinn
You're ignoring 60 years of Democrat control.

If Frist does NOT change the Senate Rules the Democrats WILL the very moment they regain control over the Senate.

First: Remember that this rule change was suggested first by Democrats.
Then: Think back over Democrat history and you will know what I say is true.
85 posted on 11/15/2003 6:00:22 AM PST by Maelstrom (To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson