Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: van_erwin
True, when Clinton realized Russia and China would veto a resolution calling for intervention, he backed away from the Security Council. However, he did not subsequently piece together a paltry, handpicked caricature of a coalition, as Bush did for the war in Iraq. Instead, he went through another established international organization—NATO.

Is the author suggesting Bush should have gone to NATO like Clintoon? Russia and China aren't in NATO, so NATO was an option for Clintoon. Bush's opponents in the UN were France and Germany, both members of NATO.

If the author really believes that while France and Germany defied us at the UN, they would have happily gone along with a NATO invasion of Iraq, then he's the moron.

21 posted on 11/14/2003 11:02:34 AM PST by kevao (Fuques France!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kevao
Moron.
22 posted on 11/14/2003 11:05:25 AM PST by fml ( You can twist perception, reality won't budge. -RUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson