[LaraCroft]

So if I 'accuse' you of something it must be true?

If the crimes against Jackson were so bad last time, why wasn't he prosecuted? They haven't released the charges this time, but apparently you still know everything, eh?

It's not news. Neither is Scott Peterson. This is like Dianna dying and everyone is hysterical. We have enough to worry about without being manic slaves for every thing done by some hollywood weirdo.

My comments stand, the majority of touching is appropriate and good and in the context of the story I read, which talked about backrubs and tucking in is appropriate behaviour.

Get over it.

[cyncooper]

So if I 'accuse' you of something it must be true?

No. And why you are directing your comment to me is a mystery. I informed you of what the charges are, which you claimed you had not heard yet. I didn't say he was guilty, just that the charges were not based on normal interaction that could or would be twisted.

My comments stand, the majority of touching is appropriate and good and in the context of the story I read, which talked about backrubs and tucking in is appropriate behaviour.

What story you read? The story here about Jackson is about allegations of sexual touching, which is most definitely inappropriate. (Please distinguish between my saying the allegation and asserting it is a fact, though I suspect it is).

Get over it.

LOL

Absurd.

[Conservative til I die]

Remove your lips from Jacko's ass. The fella, whether or not he is guilty, certainly is a bit suspect by his statements about sleeping with young men. Please don't pretend like we just made this up from nowhere.