Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jmstein7
This doesn't involve statutory wistleblowing; this involves First Amendment right, which supercedes.

1st doesn't protect from loss of job. Seeing that congress exempts itself from most laws and has a constitutional mandate to "police" itself, I would not be surprised if this staffer doesn't have the same protection a worker in the private sector has.

26 posted on 12/01/2003 8:38:00 AM PST by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: VRWC_minion
Read the case law contained herein; I think you will find that my analysis is correct.

So, only write back after examining the case law I reference.
30 posted on 12/01/2003 8:45:31 AM PST by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
The Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 did apply many employment laws to the Congress.


...But not the 1989 Whistleblower Protection Act.

32 posted on 12/01/2003 8:53:19 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson