To: jmstein7
This doesn't involve statutory wistleblowing; this involves First Amendment right, which supercedes.1st doesn't protect from loss of job. Seeing that congress exempts itself from most laws and has a constitutional mandate to "police" itself, I would not be surprised if this staffer doesn't have the same protection a worker in the private sector has.
26 posted on
12/01/2003 8:38:00 AM PST by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: VRWC_minion
Read the case law contained herein; I think you will find that my analysis is correct.
So, only write back after examining the case law I reference.
30 posted on
12/01/2003 8:45:31 AM PST by
jmstein7
To: VRWC_minion
The Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 did apply many employment laws to the Congress.
...But not the 1989 Whistleblower Protection Act.
32 posted on
12/01/2003 8:53:19 AM PST by
mrsmith
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson