Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush: No blanket amnesty for illegals
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Tuesday, December 16, 2003

Posted on 12/16/2003 3:47:13 AM PST by JohnHuang2

COMING TO AMERICA
Bush: No blanket amnesty
for illegals

But wants policy linking 'willing employer with any willing employee'

Posted: December 16, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern


© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

Responding to recent comments by Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, President Bush said yesterday he is against offering an across-the-board amnesty to illegal workers living in the United States.


President Bush at news conference yesterday (White House photo)

Last week, Ridge told a town hall meeting in Miami, Fla., the U.S. should give illegal immigrants legal status.

At a news conference in Washington, Bush replied, "I have constantly said that we need to have an immigration policy that helps match any willing employer with any willing employee."

"It makes sense that that policy go forward," he continued. "And we're in the process of working that through now so I can make a recommendation to the Congress."

He added, however, "Let me also clarify something. This administration is firmly against blanket amnesty."

Bush's comments suggest he supports some version of a congressional proposal calling for more guest workers and legalization of at least 3 million illegal aliens.

In his speech last week, Ridge said, "The bottom line is, as a country we have to come to grips with the presence of 8 to 12 million illegals, afford them some kind of legal status some way, but also as a country decide what our immigration policy is and then enforce it."


Tom Ridge

Ridge was speaking at a town hall meeting at Miami-Dade Community College, the second forum in a national series organized by the nonprofit Council for Excellence in Government.

He told meeting participants: "I'm not saying make them citizens, because they violated the law to get here. So you don't reward that type of conduct by turning over a citizenship certificate. You determine how you can legalize their presence, then, as a country, you make a decision that from this day forward, from this day forward, this is the process of entry, and if you violate that process of entry we have the resources to cope with it."

Later, Ridge's spokesman, Brian Roehrkasse, said the secretary was not referring to specific legislation but to his support of measures enabling the U.S. to gather identity and residency information on illegal aliens.

"How to keep track of people who are in the country illegally has been in the forefront of our concerns since 9-11," Roehrkasse said, according to the Cox News Service. "The secretary was talking about the 8-12 million people in the U.S. illegally. To us, it's about our mission to secure our borders. We need some method of keeping track of where these people are."

In Congress, a bill known as the AgJOBS Act would make millions of current migrant workers eligible for legal resident status and increase the number of agricultural guest workers. Rep. Howard Berman, D-Calif., a sponsor of the bill, says it is building momentum for passage in the Senate, possible as early as January. It will face opposition in the House, but he believes it will pass that chamber in the first quarter of 2004.

Another pending bill, the Border Security and Immigration Reform Act of 2003, would expand the foreign guest worker program beyond agriculture and allow illegals who have worked with a U.S. employer for a specified time to apply for legal residency.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; biggovernment; bush; bush43; criminals; deport; deportnow; illegalaliens; illegalmexicans; illegals; immigration; immigrationstatus; mexico; plunder; thewelfarestate; trialballoon; welfarestate
Tuesday, December 16, 2003

Quote of the Day

1 posted on 12/16/2003 3:47:13 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Bump and thanks for the post.
2 posted on 12/16/2003 3:49:03 AM PST by Stop Legal Plunder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
So you don't reward that type of conduct by turning over a citizenship certificate. You determine how you can legalize their presence,

Oh, I get it now. You don't legalize them with a "certificate", but with another means. OK.

Come on in amigos, the door's still open, Jorge will find another way to spin it that your illegality is Okee Dokee!


3 posted on 12/16/2003 3:59:53 AM PST by putupon ("Borders? We don' need no steenkin' borders!"-Presidente Jorge Dubya Arbusto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: putupon
I get the feeling the administration is trying to "appease" all the angry citizens after what must have been a flood of angry mail over their latest try at amnesty. I won't be able to trust again on this issue until I see some major enforcement of present ILLEGALS being deported and major policy changes that will prevent ILLEGALS from entering the U.S.
4 posted on 12/16/2003 4:05:51 AM PST by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
Yeah, Jorges pretty transparent here, put Ridge on the point to take the heat with the trial ballon, then spin them out when it doesn't fly.


5 posted on 12/16/2003 4:10:29 AM PST by putupon ("Borders? We don' need no steenkin' borders!"-Presidente Jorge Dubya Arbusto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; gubamyster
"How to keep track of people who are in the country illegally has been in the forefront of our concerns since 9-11," Roehrkasse said, according to the Cox News Service. "The secretary was talking about the 8-12 million people in the U.S. illegally. To us, it's about our mission to secure our borders. We need some method of keeping track of where these people are."

It's kind of a lie. They have been trying to figure out a way to make them legitamate. Lety their home countries keep track of them within their own borders.

This seems to be a result of our objections. We are getting closer. Apparently they are hearing us. Let's keep it up.

6 posted on 12/16/2003 4:11:59 AM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: putupon
Um, no. Just like any other immigrant who has followed policies that "legalized their presence," these people will go through the same procedure. They "legalize their presence" by going through the steps to become American citizens. I think you are being rather knee-jerk about what he said.
7 posted on 12/16/2003 4:35:34 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LS; putupon
LS to putupon: "I think you are being rather knee-jerk about what he [Bush] said."

I think you're being gullible if you believe Bush won't do everything he can to keep the borders open and to "legalize" illegal aliens.

8 posted on 12/16/2003 4:46:50 AM PST by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
...He added, however, "Let me also clarify something. This administration is firmly against blanket amnesty." ...

We have a better plan we call, Amnistia del Serape.

9 posted on 12/16/2003 5:03:21 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (It's not a blanket amnesty, it's amnistia del serape!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
He told meeting participants: "I'm not saying make them citizens, because they violated the law to get here. So you don't reward that type of conduct by turning over a citizenship certificate. You determine how you can legalize their presence, then, as a country, you make a decision that from this day forward, from this day forward, this is the process of entry, and if you violate that process of entry we have the resources to cope with it."

If this isn't an example of cognitive dissonance at its worst, then I don't know what is.

10 posted on 12/16/2003 5:49:48 AM PST by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
At a news conference in Washington, Bush replied, "I have constantly said that we need to have an immigration policy that helps match any willing employer with any willing employee."

If they are here illegaly, there doesn't need to be any matching up. It bugs me that he is somewhat vague in what he has said (yes, I know, politicians are deliberately vague as much as possible).

11 posted on 12/16/2003 6:24:44 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN MR. PRESIDENT?

12 posted on 12/16/2003 6:43:05 AM PST by VU4G10 (Have You Forgotten?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DumpsterDiver
We'll see. He hasn't done one thing so far to open them. But, in fairness, he has only done a little to close them.
13 posted on 12/16/2003 7:03:04 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LS
It will be pathetic if Bush and Ridge use "security" as an issue to grant any kind of amnesty to illegals.

14 posted on 12/16/2003 8:55:19 AM PST by texastoo (What a Continent!!! (sarcasm))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: texastoo
Quite the contrary, where there has been tightening is precisely related to security and the Patriot Act. I see no evidence that they are loosening entrance requirements.
15 posted on 12/16/2003 9:04:56 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Write-in Tom Tancredo for President next year.
16 posted on 12/16/2003 9:20:21 AM PST by citizen (Write-in Tom Tancredo President 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson