[Rebellans]

Actually, right to bear arms, and protecting our borders, is more important to me than having the federal government worrying about/checking what people do in their own bedrooms.

This is not about what people do in the privacy of their own bedrooms. There is nothing preventing homosexuals from doing what they want in private, and the proposed amendment would not change that.

This is about the definition of marriage, which is very much a public institution.

[RobbyS]

what people do in their own bedrooms. Goes back to the contreceptive decision. Code for sex has nothing to do with reproduction, and ought not to, because human reproduction is dangerous for all mankind. Better to let the human race die out so that the planet can be saved. Words of the Devil, who hates mankind.