Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RJCogburn
I don't mind it being a constitutional amendment.

However, I think the real problem is life-tenure and appointment of Scotus and other justices.

I'm in favor of a constitutional amendment in which we change to an elective judiciary with a 6 year renewable term. They are acting on political whim anymore, anyway. They might as well face political consequences.

The people can decide their judges as well as they can decide their other officials.
8 posted on 12/16/2003 5:25:01 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
The point of the judiciary is to be a check on the other branches of government.. If the supreme court was elected in the same way as the other branches, it would lose that power. The judiciary exists because there needs to be a branch that is free from the corruptive influences that political pandering and lobbying and campaigning bring. The injustice done by the Judiciary being too powerful would be dwarfed by the injustice of weakening it.
39 posted on 12/16/2003 8:19:01 PM PST by fiscally_right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson