To: knak
Should the Constitution be amended to prevent gays from marrying?
-----------------------
A constitution ammendment is not needed, and would be next to impossible. Consulting a dictionary as to the conventional use of the English language will do.
3 posted on
12/17/2003 8:31:25 PM PST by
RLK
To: RLK
Q - If you call a dog's tail a leg, how many legs does the dog have?
A - Four. Just because you call a tail a leg doesn't mean it is one.
:-)
To: RLK
Consulting a dictionary as to the conventional use of the English language will do. I know this has already been addressed but I look at it this way. The dictionary defines "is" yet it was redefined in court against us. The only definition of marriage that will stand is one that we define in the constitution
64 posted on
12/18/2003 6:40:32 AM PST by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson