Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: JennieOsborne; /\XABN584; 10mm; 3D-JOY; 5Madman; <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; 1Peter2:16; ...
Passing it on..
2 posted on
12/22/2003 12:52:23 PM PST by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
To: davidosborne
Euro world order wannabe.
3 posted on
12/22/2003 12:52:29 PM PST by
Rebelbase
To: davidosborne
Can anything from two weeks ago qualify as "breaking"?
4 posted on
12/22/2003 12:52:37 PM PST by
aynrandfreak
(If 9/11 didn't change you, you're a bad human being)
To: davidosborne
He's toast. The boy's cheese done slipped off his cracker.
5 posted on
12/22/2003 12:52:59 PM PST by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: davidosborne
He wants us to consult with people we bailed out of two world wars and protected for over 50 years because they are smarter than we are? What a Clymer!!
8 posted on
12/22/2003 12:54:15 PM PST by
anoldafvet
(Democrats: Making the world safe for terrorists one lie at a time.)
To: davidosborne
Sounds like he's trying to out-looney the angry Dr. Dean.
9 posted on
12/22/2003 12:54:30 PM PST by
Redcloak
(°¿°)
To: davidosborne
Did he really say that?
To: davidosborne
This doesnt surprise me, most dims just arent as outright when they say this.
Interesting that he would give Europe the "right of first refusal" instead of Congress.
13 posted on
12/22/2003 12:56:05 PM PST by
RWR8189
To: davidosborne
Keep talking, Wesley, keep talking . . .
16 posted on
12/22/2003 12:57:06 PM PST by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: davidosborne
So would Hillary. She lauded socialism and Europe and UN in her visit to Germany.
So would most of the Dem 9 who would seek out the UN on security issues.
They act like the UN is a greater good than the US.
Remember, even BClintonx42 said he foresaw the US as an eventual 3rd world power, so we should play nice with other nations.
We have to be most vigilant in what the politicians say. Too bad the media doesn't take them to task. But the media is just too busy reading the wire service feeds and calling it investigative journalism.
19 posted on
12/22/2003 12:59:39 PM PST by
TomGuy
To: davidosborne
No surprise here.
100% of demoRats and 75% of Republicans want to do the same thing.
To: davidosborne
You should have posted a HURL AlERT!
"CLARK: Of course its reckless, Chris. Look, anytime youre dealing in the intelligence business, youre getting information that you have to fully vet. Everybody who gives information has a motive. It may be monetary, it may be revenge, it may be they want back in power..."
Oh, ya' mean like those completely bogus reports of genocide in the Serbian/Bosnian tiff, and the completely off intel that caused the bombing of Serb commuter trains, residences, hospitals and the Chi-com embassy?
What a piece of work this crock is.
21 posted on
12/22/2003 1:00:13 PM PST by
OpusatFR
(Al Dean and Howard Gore, separated at birth.)
To: davidosborne
The dems internal polling must indicate that they haven't got a chance with moderates and independents, so they'd best just troll in the lefty cesspools.
24 posted on
12/22/2003 1:00:42 PM PST by
randog
(Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
To: davidosborne
Too bad he forgot the words in his commissioning and each of his promotion oaths. There is no allegiance or recognition of sovereignty to any thing other than the constitution. "...I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, ... and bear true faith and allegiance to the same. So help me God!"
That's how mine read and were repeated; 5 times! Last time I checked, God had not relieved me of that oath.
Think we need to remind him of that in every FREEP we do; In person, in letters to the media, or on line.
25 posted on
12/22/2003 1:01:21 PM PST by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: davidosborne
"Right of first refusal" in a business context doesn't mean the right to veto something, it means the right to have first crack at something before it's offered to someone else. In a military/diplomatic context I'm not sure what it means, and I'm not sure he does either. It sure sounds like his intention would be to give Europeans veto power over U.S. military action.
To: davidosborne
While smoking crack with Coward Dean, Weasely Clark inferred that he was the best candidate for whatever reason.
I have a chance to win!
A snowball's chance in hell is looking much more possible, and after all, who has more experience than I? declared Dean.
Dean later declared that he would clean up polution on Mars left by the Klingons.
27 posted on
12/22/2003 1:01:57 PM PST by
bobo1
To: davidosborne
"Europeans" does not mean "Europeans."
It does not mean Britain, Holland, Poland, etc.
It is a somewhat-encoded word for France, and maybe Germany too.
Most of the Democrats are running this year on a policy plank to give Paris more money and power.
33 posted on
12/22/2003 1:09:11 PM PST by
Shermy
(Threat level orange - buy more duct tape)
To: davidosborne
I think they're playing a funeral march......
36 posted on
12/22/2003 1:11:32 PM PST by
hilaryrhymeswithrich
(Al Franken is a pimple on the butt of liberalism)
To: davidosborne
What a complete whack job.
38 posted on
12/22/2003 1:11:52 PM PST by
tomahawk
To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
Just damn.If you want on the new list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...
40 posted on
12/22/2003 1:13:29 PM PST by
mhking
(It's in your home state...it's outside your front door...and it's going to eat YOU up!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson