Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Barbarian at The Gate -- Financial Sense Gruest Editorial by Alex Wallenwein
Financial Sense Online ^ | 12/22/03 | Alex Wallenwein

Posted on 12/22/2003 8:06:08 PM PST by arete

Home  l  Broadcast  l  WrapUp  l  Storm Watch  l  Perspectives  l  Sitemap  l  About Us


The Barbarian at The Gate
'Barbarous Relic' Sounds Death-Knell for Keynesians
by Alex Wallenwein, Editor & Publisher
The Euro vs Dollar Currency War Monitor
December 22, 2003

The following Reuters news item is outstanding in itself. Probably one of the best examples of financial news reporting I have seen so far. The reporter, Daniel Bases, is not afraid to say the unspeakable: that what normally counts as the accepted perspective of economic analysis - Keynesian analysis - is at a complete loss to explain the current phenomenon of free-falling dollar values during a time of rapidly improving US economic performance.

At the same time, the facts reported show not only the validity of - but the dire necessity for - ‘euro vs dollar’ analysis to get to the truth of the matter. Any economic analysis that fails to take into account the protracted assault on the dollar that the creation and existence of the euro has made possible, will be unable to explain current economic phenomena.

The Reuters news article is reproduced below, with commentary inserted in bold so it’s easy to tell which is what.

Alex Wallenwein


FOREX-Dollar gets no respect, hits record low vs euro
Reuters, 12.02.03, 3:37 PM ET

By Daniel Bases

NEW YORK, Dec 2 (Reuters) - The dollar hit a record low versus the euro on Tuesday in a broad sell-off as investors ignored a U.S. economic upswing and instead went along with the dominant dollar downtrend. (Emphasis supplied)

Interesting. Investors have never ignored an US economic upswing yet. What’s different this time?

Tuesday's strong November auto sales data and Monday's factory report showing the fastest pace of growth in 20 years would normally benefit the dollar. But investors have been forced to either join the dollar sell-off or get out its way.

That’s a strong statement: If you fight the dollar sell-off, you’ll get hurt.

"People try to put a reason behind this sell-off, citing steel tariffs or trade protectionism, but the truth is the United States has a huge trade deficit but does not have high enough interest rates to attract enough capital here to finance it," said Mike King, trader at Commerzbank in New York.

I thought we were told that a lower forex value of the dollar would help lower the current account and trade deficits? Why is this no longer so? Does it mean the dollar has yet to go lower? How much lower?

"Dollar weakness is just the way of things, and people need to sell dollars which, in a thin holiday market, makes the moves one way and very violent," he said.

Interest rates in the United States stand at a 45-year low of 1.00 percent and are not expected to rise anytime soon. With rates in the euro zone at 2 percent; in Britain at 3.75 percent; in Canada at 2.75 percent; and in Australia at 5 percent, the dollar is less attractive for foreign investors to purchase.

This is extremely significant. Worldwide, the US has the lowest interest rates which, all other things being equal, would make the dollar a less attractive currency than virtually any other. But other things are not equal. The US economy is running ahead of all others, even China’s, but the dollar is still being sold off. Why?

The euro surged to a fresh record high for the third day straight, touching $1.2091<EUR=> according to Reuters data, and measured a 1 percent gain on the day. Traders see the next resistance level for the surging euro in the $1.2125 area.

... and we will blow right through it.

In the last month, the U.S. financial markets have seen an outflow of foreign capital that is highly correlated to the decline in the dollar.

Here it comes:

According to the Bank of New York's portfolio flow monitor, a tool used to predict the direction of currencies, a net $2.3 billion in cash from both equities and fixed income exited the United States, while the euro zone has seen non-European investors plug 1.6 billion euros into the region's stock and bond markets. (Emphasis supplied)

And this despite the euro’s internal crisis threatening to derail the much-vaunted "Growth and Stability Pact", formerly the centerpiece of EU monetary and fiscal policy. The "Pact" was set up to discourage individual member governments from deficit-spending their way out of economic recessions. The recently revealed cracks in this bulwark against financial profligacy should have served to weaken the euro. Why didn’t it?

Further, this is first-hand proof of the validity of euro vs dollar fundamental analysis: These 2.3 billion in cash didn’t just exit the geographic United States: they exited the dollar-system altogether. That means dollars were sold and other currencies (mainly euros, as is apparent) were bought. Where do these divested dollars end up? In US hands. Some will go to pay for US imports, others will stay and circulate inside the US economy, further expanding the already bloated US money supply. A central axiom of classical economic thought is that:

Monetary inflation always causes price-inflation – eventually.

We are now entering that "eventually" phase of the fiat-dollar system’s thirty-year sojourn. Until recently, international dollar demand for trade and reserve purposes has enabled the US to run its printing presses till they glowed red-hot in the dark. Now, dropping world-wide dollar demand is sending those greenbacks flying home. The inevitable result: inflation.

Welcome, dear Traveler. Welcome home to true (classical economics-style) fundamental analysis. It doesn’t get any more ‘fundamental’ than this.

"We would have expected the U.S. equity markets to rally with such strong economic data and corporate earnings. On the fixed income side there is disappointment. Foreigners are not investing in U.S. fixed income because of interest rate differentials," said Michael Woolfolk, currency strategist at Bank of New York. (Emphasis supplied)

Oh boy! More pressure for Brother Al to raise rates - but he CAN’T! If he does, this "recovery" will run out of the only thing that really fuels it: printed paper of the currency variety.

Greenspan’s game plan is to "hope" that his printing presses will produce such a strong economy that he can afford to gently start raising rates. But where will the dollar be by that time?

If the dollar keeps dropping at its current clip, despite a booming economy, it will have lost another 20 to 30% by the time it’s safe to raise rates. We can let economists figure out what that means, quantitatively, in terms of domestic prices. But, one thing is for sure: they will go higher. Much higher.

Prices will go higher by the simple fact that a lower dollar means higher prices for imports, such as oil, electronics, and cars. Then add the "returning dollar" effect, and you have a recipe for hyper-inflation - US-style.
On Tuesday, Sterling hit a five-year high against the dollar for the fifth straight session, reaching $1.7309<GBP=> according to Reuters data, a gain of roughly 0.75 percent on the day. If sterling hits the $1.7350 area, it will be its strongest point since busting out of the ERM 10 years ago.

The dollar fell to a near two-week low against the yen of 108.60<JPY=>, off 0.68 percent, while hitting a six month low of 1.2850 Swiss francs <CHF=>, off nearly 1 percent, according to Reuters data.

Gold hit a 7-1/2 year high in the wake of dollar weakness.

U.S. ACCELERATION

But the dollar drop comes amid more good news for the economy.

Brother Al can only forestall, not prevent. To keep the economy bounding upwards while dollar-values drop, he must pump even more liquidity into the system. He doesn’t have much room left on the interest rate side of the equation. He will soon have to buy treasuries: at first short-term, then longer term ones. This will directly inject money into the system (the printed dollars he uses to pay for outstanding treasuries) and drive up bond prices, lowering their yields and thereby long term interest rates. He said he wouldn’t do it, but that was said after he had previously threatened to do exactly that, so don’t tell me he won’t go back on his word.

Buying treasuries, especially long-term ones, is about the only arrow he has left in his quiver. He may be hoping to entice foreigners into the game by hypnotizing them with rising treasuries prices – but $400-plus gold is now blinding their greedy little eyes to the splendors of dollar-investing. Will they jump aboard this treasuries-train? It doesn’t look that way. They already know where this train is headed.

If they don’t, who will finance the trade and current-account deficits? Answer: Nobody! The dollar will have to go lower still - way past the pain-threshold of Americans, and therefore of US policy makers.

On Tuesday, November U.S. car sales data were generally strong, giving more reason to believe the U.S. economy, which grew at a blistering 8.2 percent overall in the third quarter is speeding ahead, whereas its peers in Europe and Asia are still languishing.

"I call this the death of fundamental (economic) analysis. Every piece of economic data points to a stronger dollar, but it is not having an impact," said a market source at a money center bank in New York who requested anonymity. (Emphasis supplied)

Yes, that’s right. It is in fact the death of "economic" (speak: Keynesian economic) analysis. All of these factors interacting in this way cannot possibly be explained without taking Keynes’ nemesis - that "barbarous relic" called gold - into account.

On Friday, the November payrolls report will give a better read on whether job growth, a lagging economic indicator, is finally confirming the growth seen elsewhere in the economy.

Maybe it will, maybe it won’t. None of that will change the picture fundamentally. (Sorry to rub it in like that.)

U.S. payrolls are expected to rise by 135,000, but the November unemployment rate is seen unchanged at 6.0 percent.

(Hmm. How does that work??)

Elsewhere, the Bank of Canada kept interest rates steady at 2.75 percent on Tuesday, as expected. The U.S. dollar traded at at C$1.2970 <CAD=>.

The Reserve Bank of Australia is expected to hike rates 25 basis points to 5.25 percent when it meets late on Tuesday (New York time). The Australian dollar rose to a six-year high of US$0.7322 <AUD=> in anticipation of the rate increase. The Aussie dollar is now up some 30 percent since its 2002 close.

That traditional central bank policy tool for increasing currency-attractiveness is now a pure luxury - one the US Fed no longer has access to. It’s "Fed-in-the-Box" time. Brother Al’s only way "out" is to dig himself - and the US economy - in even deeper by opening the floodgates of monetary expansion even further.

That is, if he stays within the confines of Keynesian economic thought.

Within that confinement, the air is getting pretty stale by now. Sooner or later, he (or whoever will replace him) may just have to open the door to the golden Barbarian who is standing there, knocking ..... waiting ....

Might as well let him in now.

(Additional reporting by Gertrude Chavez and John Parry in New York and Justyna Pawlak in London)
Copyright 2003, Reuters News Service


© 2003 Alex Wallenwein
Bio and Editorial Archive

Home  l  Broadcast  l  WrapUp  l  Storm Watch  l  Perspectives  l  Sitemap  l  About Us  l  Contact Us

Copyright ©  James J. Puplava  Financial Sense™ is a Registered Trademark
P. O.  Box 503147 San Diego, CA 92150-3147 USA  858.487.3939
Disclaimer



TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: 1buyandeatgoldnow; 1morearatebullshit; 1whopaysarate; americasalwayswrong; bonds; boom; bubble; bust; crash; credit; currency; debt; deflation; depression; dollar; economy; fed; fraud; gold; goldbuggery; goldmongerinfools; hateamericacrowd; inflation; investing; jobs; money; recession; silver; stockmarket; theskydothfall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Brother Al can only forestall, not prevent. To keep the economy bounding upwards while dollar-values drop, he must pump even more liquidity into the system. He doesn’t have much room left on the interest rate side of the equation. He will soon have to buy treasuries: at first short-term, then longer term ones. This will directly inject money into the system (the printed dollars he uses to pay for outstanding treasuries) and drive up bond prices, lowering their yields and thereby long term interest rates. He said he wouldn’t do it, but that was said after he had previously threatened to do exactly that, so don’t tell me he won’t go back on his word.

Buying treasuries, especially long-term ones, is about the only arrow he has left in his quiver. He may be hoping to entice foreigners into the game by hypnotizing them with rising treasuries prices – but $400-plus gold is now blinding their greedy little eyes to the splendors of dollar-investing. Will they jump aboard this treasuries-train? It doesn’t look that way. They already know where this train is headed.

Interest rates must come down and more debt must be created to keep the illusionary recovery alive. These indeed are interesting times.

Richard W.

1 posted on 12/22/2003 8:06:11 PM PST by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: arete
It is going to get even more interesting.
2 posted on 12/22/2003 8:10:25 PM PST by Radix (We just watched the DVD of the N.E. Patriots Super Bowl season. We are getting ready!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tauzero; kezekiel; ChadGore; Harley - Mississippi; Dukie; Matchett-PI; Moonman62; Free Vulcan; ...
I do not beleve that there will be another Market WrapUp published until after the holidays.

Excellent Roger Arnold shows today as Roger is back from vacation and discusses the why and how of the need for the FED to start buying treasuries.

First Hour of the Roger Arnold Show

Second Hour of the Roger Arnold Show

Richard W.

3 posted on 12/22/2003 8:14:03 PM PST by arete (Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arete
Well, the falling dollar is due in large part to the balance of trade problem, and that is always worse when the US is coming out of a recession while the rest of the world is still in one -- when we're buying and they're not.
4 posted on 12/22/2003 8:14:39 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Radix
It is going to get even more interesting.

Yep, looks like the FED is going to be handing out money. That ought to be fun.

Richard W.

5 posted on 12/22/2003 8:17:40 PM PST by arete (Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arete
If you're tracking my little gold pick ITS, it hit another year high today on big volume.

I am one happy gold-camper. ;^)
6 posted on 12/22/2003 8:18:56 PM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
when the US is coming out of a recession while the rest of the world is still in one -- when we're buying and they're not.

Just who do you consider "the rest of the world"?

Richard W.

7 posted on 12/22/2003 8:20:12 PM PST by arete (Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: arete
I do not beleve that there will be another Market WrapUp published until after the holidays.


Merry Christmas and a happy new year :-)
8 posted on 12/22/2003 11:21:10 PM PST by SkyRat (If privacy wasn't of value, we wouldn't have doors on bathrooms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: arete
Looks like 65 is a good estimate for where the dollar will end up on the index after all when the devaluations are in.

I wonder what massive interventions will take place as that approaches? We're at ~88 right now.

Wallenwein's exuberance about the collapse of a currency is a little worrisome, but then again, as a metals dealer, his stuff has to be taken with a small sack of salt in that regard.

Curiously, a lot of articles are coming out fingering 2005 as the year things come unraveled. Interesting.
9 posted on 12/23/2003 12:33:00 AM PST by superloser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Couldn't find it. How bout a name and where it's traded.
10 posted on 12/23/2003 1:11:13 AM PST by imawit (sometimes I think, sometimes I don't ... or is it stink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: arete
Richard -- First, let me wish for you the merriest of all Christmases, and the best of the New Year!

Second, let me offer a small piece of very profitable advice -- never think that you know what is GOING to occur, and never, ever, think that your political/economic views have anything to do with your making a profit via trading.

Your and my politico-economic views are similar, but the market is the market, and doesn't give a cold kwap about them.

The only profitable method of argument about the future behaviour of any mkt is: IF (such-and-such) occurs THEN (so-and-so) will occur. In short, mkts are anticipatory discounting mechanisms of the future.

Just at this moment, and speaking of forex only, this translates roughly to: IF (the U.S. gov't takes no positive action to ''defend'' the $ and/or does not raise interest rates to boot), THEN (USD will continue to decline **for a time** against EUR, GBP, and the usual suspects). The ccy mkt's anti-dollar bandwagon is rolling and has a pretty fair amount of momentum just now.

The next 9 days mean nothing, btw -- I strongly suggest that you draw NO inference from the action in the ccy mkts. It'll be mostly book squaring for year-end, in any case.

In currency trading, macroeconomic developments are very important, but their implications filter in only slowly to the mkt; much more immediately, the effects of the anticipation of interest rate CHANGES are felt, and more importantly still, ccy mkts are HIGHLY inertial -- or, in plain English, a trend, once in place, will tend strongly to continue in its current direction. So, unless you happen to be a technically-oriented ''swing'' trader, trying to profit from ''normal'' short-term mkt fluctuations, what do you derive from these possibly inconvenient facts (which, btw, admit of no exception in history)?

Well, I've a few thoughts on this point, and already have some capital in place backing my view, and you are perfectly free to inquire as to details at your convenience...but, mate, if you EVER try to trade ccys, short-term, long-term, don't care, just on the basis of your macroeconomic or your politico-economic view, you're going to give up a WHOLE lot of dollars to no purpose.

Let's don't do that, ok?

Best to you,
SAJ

11 posted on 12/23/2003 1:13:49 AM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: imawit
ITS.V, International Taurus, trades on the Vancouver exchange. I should have bought it when headsonpikes first recommended it at $.10 (closed yesterday at $.37). :-(
12 posted on 12/23/2003 6:22:14 AM PST by Soren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
Good post. I also tend to think in terms of IF.. THEN... Regarding the USD and the trade deficit, I would expect a lag between the time the dollar falls and a decline in the trade deficit, and even more so in the current situation since there seem to be more structural changes to the economy than in the past. Do you happen to know historically if this has been the case? What are your thoughts on the current situation with respect to how far the USD will need to fall to bring the trade deficit into line and the timing? I'm not sure how people make that kind of estimate except to look at the historical correlation between a falling currency and trade balances. Even then it seems like there is a high level of uncertainty due to the many differences between the experience you are basing your analysis on and the current situation.
13 posted on 12/23/2003 6:37:51 AM PST by Soren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: superloser
How did you come up with 65 for the UDX? I'm curious as to the approaches people take to estimate this. Regarding 2005, it seems like the conventional wisdom (for bears) is that the Fed will do whatever it takes to keep things humming along thru the election, and then it all falls apart.

14 posted on 12/23/2003 6:51:09 AM PST by Soren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SkyRat
I do not beleve that there will be another Market WrapUp published until after the holidays.

That would be my guess, although I will continue looking for and posting interesting and informative economic and financial articles through the holidays and pinging the Market WrapUp regulars to them.

A Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you also!

Richard W.

15 posted on 12/23/2003 9:03:57 AM PST by arete (Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: superloser; Beck_isright
Curiously, a lot of articles are coming out fingering 2005 as the year things come unraveled. Interesting.

The FED is still battling a slowing economy and even though there are many who feel that deflation is of little risk, that may not be the case. So far, the way I see it, the best the central planners have been able to do is delay the day of reckoning.

Richard W.

16 posted on 12/23/2003 9:16:13 AM PST by arete (Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
Second, let me offer a small piece of very profitable advice -- never think that you know what is GOING to occur, and never, ever, think that your political/economic views have anything to do with your making a profit via trading.

Your and my politico-economic views are similar, but the market is the market, and doesn't give a cold kwap about them.

The only profitable method of argument about the future behaviour of any mkt is: IF (such-and-such) occurs THEN (so-and-so) will occur. In short, mkts are anticipatory discounting mechanisms of the future.

I really enjoy your posts becaused they are consistently both reasoned and informed. Any assumptions I'm making now are strickly guess work and speculative in an attempt to get a better picture of the reality. I do believe though, that the real story and the real battle is still between the FED/government and deflation. I think that this has caused many market distortions and that indeed, the market could actually be sending a false message. It is a battle of historic proportions and import -- can the monetarists pull it off or will the Austrians be proven right. The markets are betting on the monetarists it would seem. Prematurely, I believe.

Have a happy Holiday Season!

Richard W.

17 posted on 12/23/2003 9:31:33 AM PST by arete (Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Soren
Concur completely regarding the lag between the start of a currency pair's downtrend and the alteration of the trade balance between the 2 nations (or, these days, blocs). US trade balance is not deteriorating as quickly at this point, and may reverse trend at some point shortly. ''May'' is appropriate here because I cannot (and I don't think too many can, either) tell about the net long-term effect on the trade balance of the permanent loss of a lot of low-value-added manufacturing.

Regarding history and the ccy mkts, it has been shown repeatedly in innumerable studies that macro (or ''structural'', if you prefer) developments and trends typically only serve to emphasise currency-rate movements, not to dominate or to initiate them. The dollar's problem (or, at least, the mkt's sentiment concerning the dollar's problem) is not -- never has been -- the famous ''current account deficit''. This is lot of hooey. As long as the capital account (i.e. flow of capital) was in countervailing surplus, the current account didn't matter much. If other nations want to swap hard goods for paper, more power to them (the idiots). And, up until early 2002, that's **exactly** what they wanted to do. Considerably less enthusiasm for that idea now, of course.

The problem that has been developing over the past couple of years is that capital flows are shifting, away from the US in fair degree. That this is occurring is not a surprise; with interest rates risibly low and USD working lower, why would anyone **perforce** want to hold USD-denominated assets? This situation (and NOT inflation -- inflation is already here, in large measure, and p*ss on the silly-ass CPI and the even more laughable ''core inflation'' rate, ex-food-and-energy, which is only a valuable indicator if you don't eat, heat your home, or drive) is the reason that short rates will begin a longish-term rise next year. The capital account MUST be gotten back into a favourable state.

Were next year not an election year, I should expect short rates to rise 100-150 basis pts, but, that not being the case, I'm looking for just 50, the first 25 at the May or July meeting, maybe 25 in Sep, and surely 25 or 50 after the election, in Dec. USD will stay weak, with some corrections here and there, until the mkt perceives that rates will begin AND CONTINUE to rise. This process of sentiment revision will be accelerated **if** the hearty rise in stocks of 2003 extends into the new year (I've no position on that).

18 posted on 12/23/2003 10:44:52 AM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Soren
How did you come up with 65 for the UDX? I'm curious as to the approaches people take to estimate this.

Its an educated guess, really :-)

I'm not terribly hot on making predictions so what I tend to do is to take a look at direction and chart it to see if it looks like a trend or a blip. If it looks like a trend, I go digging through the historical record to see what it has done in the past. Then check news reports and fundamentals to see what else is going on. If there has been quite a rise, it also means quite a fall. Do a quick calculation and adjust by a fudge factor to cook the first guesstimate, then do some deeper analysis to see how far off I am.

As always, its a guess, but the best educated guess I can make. I'm not an expert, don't claim to be, and I always say that I'm probably wrong.

As things go, I'll revise it as more information comes in.

For my guesstimate, the historical record shows about a 40-60% drop as about the average maximum drop against another currency that has ever happenned. I know there is a down trend and that currencies continue a rise or descent over a long period of time rather than adjusting quickly (unless its a rout).

UDX is calculated against a very small basket of other currencies, the Euro (57.6%), Yen (13.6%), Pound (11.9), CDN (9.1%), Swedish Krona (4.2%), and Swiss Franc (3.6%). I haven't calculated out an estimate of each of those yet. So, this is an educated guess without going to all the crunching *yet*.

The high on $UDX was around 120, and since falls have been around 40-60% against other currencies in the past, and the majority of the currencies that go into factoring UDX are the Euro, Yen, Pound, and CDN, I'll figure the dollar will drop like a rock against all of those and likely in similar manners. So, I took the low number and calculated that out to get 48. Well, I don't think it will drop below 50 because that would set off absolute shockwaves (IMO), but I don't think it will stop at 72 given that there is an effort to devalue going on and central bankers *generally* overshoot. So, my initial guesstimate is that it will come to rest at 65.

I almost always *over* estimate the first SWAG.....and this is the first SWAG. Next step is going to be to sit down and do some real number crunching instead of just taking a stare, reading tea leaves, taking a guess, and throwing a dart.

So, that's how I did my first guess at where it will land. Sometime over the holiday, I'll do some better number crunching and run the math.

The important thing to me in planning is that the dollar is going down and it looks ugly. That's good enough to get started with. The details will help fine-tune as I go along.

I don't know if this is helpful or not.

Its just an outline of how I get started in doing some analysis. Right or wrong....you've got to do what you're comfortable with. This method seems to work OK for me. Its not the best thing in the world, its not the worst. Its given me average results, which is fine. The rest of it is just "gut feeling" which tends also to deliver OK results.

19 posted on 12/23/2003 10:46:18 AM PST by superloser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: superloser; SAJ
Thanks for your responses. I continue to believe that understanding the future of the USD is the key to understanding the future of the US economy and markets. I try to look for ultimate causes, when possible. The USD is falling because capital flows are shifting away from the US. Why? Beyond the fact that it tends to be a self-reinforcing trend, is it because interest rates are low and US markets are perceived as higher risk? And is that because the economy is choking on high debt levels and the markets are over-valued due to asset inflation? And is that because the Fed was irresponsible in its expansion of the money supply in the latter half of the 1990s? As far as I can tell, this last one seems to be the ultimate cause of our economic problems.
20 posted on 12/23/2003 12:11:11 PM PST by Soren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson