Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/22/2003 10:11:04 PM PST by fatso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fatso; jmstein7
Thank you very much for posting this excellent article. I'm glad to see NewsMax carried it.
2 posted on 12/22/2003 10:19:00 PM PST by Judith Anne (Send a message to the Democrat traitors--ROCKEFELLER MUST RESIGN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fatso; chadsworth; Miss Marple; Mo1; Chad Fairbanks; ohioWfan; rintense; Grampa Dave
Even before the memo was written, Rockefeller's staff already was off on its own, well outside the traditional bipartisan channels. According to the memo, the "FBI Niger investigation" of reports that Saddam Hussein's regime had tried to buy uranium from West Africa "was done solely at the request of the vice chairman."

This is a keeper, and a must read!

4 posted on 12/22/2003 10:22:41 PM PST by ladyinred (If all the world's a stage, I want to operate the trap door!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fatso
"tolerated, ignored or excused"

And .. why is it being tolerated, ignored and/or excused" ..??
6 posted on 12/22/2003 10:41:40 PM PST by CyberAnt (America is the greatest force for good on the planet ..!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy; Wolfstar; Shermy
Even before the memo was written, Rockefeller's staff already was off on its own, well outside the traditional bipartisan channels. According to the memo, the "FBI Niger investigation" of reports that Saddam Hussein's regime had tried to buy uranium from West Africa "was done solely at the request of the vice chairman."

So, it was Jay Rockefeller (and not Dick Cheney) who sent Joseph C. Wilson IV on his mission to Niamey? Was this, indeed, a partisan set-up from the very outset?

Would explain a lot...

9 posted on 12/22/2003 10:51:09 PM PST by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

bump
10 posted on 12/22/2003 10:55:10 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat (www.firethebcs.com, www.weneedaplayoff.com, www.firemackbrown.com, www.firecarlreese.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fatso
I'm sure this is the ONLY bit sedition going on.. To think that other committes have been compromised by this veritable 5th column on naieve republicans is ridiculous... and absolutely tin foil hat stuff.. And when judged by the high minded and patriotic way the democrat contenders for president have executed their campaigns theres nothing to worry about...

UNLESS YOU'RE NOT STUPID...

12 posted on 12/22/2003 11:11:21 PM PST by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fatso
Borders on treason.
13 posted on 12/22/2003 11:12:13 PM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fatso
I think this pic kinda sums it all up. : )


15 posted on 12/23/2003 12:33:02 AM PST by Prime Choice (Americans are a spiritual people. We're happy to help members of al Qaeda meet God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fatso
bump
16 posted on 12/23/2003 2:13:12 AM PST by lowbridge ("Is it just me, or is Kwanzaa becoming way too commercialized?" -Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fatso
It centered on duping the panel's Republican chairman, Sen. Pat Roberts of Kansas...bipartisanship ended last year when Democrats demanded that the committee staff be split...the Republicans caved, and the staff director of the Democrats, Christopher Mellon, built his own autonomous apparatus.

This problem of weakness on the Republican side seems primarily to occur in the Senate. I don't understand the reason for it. Perhaps the fact that there are only 100 senators let's them get too chummy and collegial with each other. Whatever the reason, this memo exposed the fact that Republican weakness and Democrat aggressiveness have gone beyond mere political annoyance to a point where the effect is truly seditious and dangerous for the nation.

I think in the new year, we in the politically astute public should put enormous pressure on Republican senators to get very, very tough with the Democrat side. If it means everything grinds to a halt in the Senate, so be it.

23 posted on 12/23/2003 10:55:18 AM PST by Wolfstar (George W. Bush — the 1st truly great world leader of the 21st Century)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fatso
If you want to get a good idea of how Rockefeller has taken over the activity of the Intelligence Committee just make a google search and enter the name Wendy Morigi, Rockefeller's spokesperson.
29 posted on 12/23/2003 2:03:09 PM PST by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fatso
Very interesting article. it explains a lot.

What it doesn't explain is why these people still work within sensitive positions inside these critical intelligence bureaucracies. They should have been shown the door long ago!

30 posted on 12/23/2003 2:48:45 PM PST by Gritty ("Conservatives play fair hoping Liberals will play fair too. That will never happen."-Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

bttt


33 posted on 10/12/2004 1:58:28 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson