Posted on 12/26/2003 8:32:48 AM PST by WaterDragon
When I was in college, I was often doing what I wasn't supposed to. Do you know people who need to study for a test and can sit for four hours straight, methodically reviewing one fact after the next, never taking their mind off their notes? Their attention never wavers.
My attention always wavered. Whenever I went to the library to get the book I needed, I was fascinated by the book next to it, or a few books over. Suddenly they seemed much more important than the book I was supposed to read. When I was supposed to be studying for a test, I suddenly felt the need to peruse a different subject how narrow the test seemed! Why was I limiting myself? I must broaden my horizons! Never was the impulse stronger than when I was studying for a test.
One day, I was sitting in the Jerusalem Public Library reviewing for a doctoral exam. The reading list was heavy, very heavy. I wandered over to the shelves and noticed a copy of Harry A. Wolfson's Crescas' Critique of Aristotle it had precisely nothing to do with my upcoming exam.....(snip)
Under Einstein's special theory of relativity, no two observers moving through space at different speeds and we are all moving through space see things the same way.
For example, observers moving at different speeds will measure the length of a stick differently. They will also measure the time it takes for the stick to pass by differently.
Time is relative to the speed and position of the observer. On earth, we are all moving through space at the same speed, so reality seems objective. It is not this way.
All this is another way of pointing out the contingent nature of the human being as he or she strives to become like, to apprehend and to communicate with the one objective reality, G-d.
Click Here For Immediate Link to Full Article.
(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...
Excellent thread WD!
Objectively speaking, is it even possible for humans to become, apprehend, or communicate with God in reality?
Relativism as a near synonym of psychologism is older than Einstein's STOR. Do the laws of logic have objective reality as idea, or are they subject to the observations of the thinking being? Are they generalizations from thought-experiment, facts, or are they beyond time? Einstein mentioned that time was important to his theory; if so, his results wouldn't be objective law except as they concern the nature of time in itself.
That is the hallmark of humanity.
I dont feel like I am waiting around, but it seems like I am just waiting around.
Above all, I want to be with my family when I die.
Only if it's divisible by obsolete abjectivity !!! ;-))
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.