I am contemplating starting a Gallup Ping List.
FReepmail me if you want to be on it, and if 2 more people inquire I will start it.
1 posted on
01/05/2004 9:25:34 PM PST by
RWR8189
To: All
|
Hit Me, Please!
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com |
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC
Help Keep "The Duck" out of the White House! |
2 posted on
01/05/2004 9:27:47 PM PST by
Support Free Republic
(I'd rather be sleeping. Let's get this over with so I can go back to sleep!)
To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping List - Polls and how they twist things. But it seems that no matter how they change the words, the majority of American people still don't want "gay" marriage.
To: RWR8189
Flame away, but I can't support this, even though I oppose gay marriage. Seperation of Powers and 10th amendment.
I don't support any measure in the US Constitution that limits individual freedom in any way whatsoever. I WOULD support an amendment saying that a state does not have to recognize any marriage not between a man or a woman.
I'd like to see the feds out of the marriage business completely myself, but I'd settle for 50 states banning gay marriage, and the current Defense of Marriage Act.
4 posted on
01/05/2004 10:05:34 PM PST by
Dan from Michigan
("Every man dies. Not every man really lives")
To: RWR8189
This whole business is a monumental waste of time, and a distraction from the real issues of the day.
It's VERY difficult to change the Constitution, as we saw with the balanced budget amendment a few years back. Here you had 80% of the American people behind it, and well over 2/3rds of Congress claimed to support it. Yet it never even got close to becoming law.
6 posted on
01/05/2004 10:13:17 PM PST by
Mulder
(Fight the future)
To: RWR8189
FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT (H.J.Res. 56) Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither this constitution or the constitution of any state, nor state or federal law, shall be construed to require that marital status or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups.
Alliance for Marriage
If they worded the polls this way, the result would be 70% to 30% in favor. If the Republicans had a brain, they would run on this platform, pick up 20 house seats and a half-dozen senate seats. Of course, they are much too wussy to beat the democruds with the gay truncheon that's been handed to them.
The minority votes are there for the taking on this issue:
MARRIAGE AMENDMENT NOW!
17 posted on
01/06/2004 11:01:54 AM PST by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson