"Explicit statistical evidence of massive ballot tampering in Palm Beach, Fl"

reagan.com ^ | REPOST - 09 November, 2000 | Robert A. Cook, PE

[Travis McGee]

With talk radio, the internet, and FOX, the old liberal media monopoly is broken. If Republican pols have the guts, (few do) they can exploit "our" media. But they still want to be loved, and won't.

[Robert A Cook PE]

Concur.

[Robert A Cook PE]

A rushed job, written as new info came in over the nights and afternoon between Tuesday and Thursday.

Also, it should be updated with the info from Harris' book on the election, and include the panhandle votes that were "discouraged" out by the democrat early call for Gore.

The false "40,000 disenfranchised" often cited by black racelords outght be included as the lie that it is.

Other things.

Know an editor?

[Tall_Texan]

There will never be a Democratic "Watergate."

That's not because Republicans don't fight hard enough (although it's true they don't) but because Democrats have no rule of law and are totally shameless.

Bob Livingston resigned rather than judge Clinton when he knew of his own adultery. I could never imagine a Democrat taking that step unless he was up for election and the polls showed he couldn't win. But it's not the sin that shames them, rather the political expediency of not advancing their goal.

Any form of hypocrisy is perfectly allowable if you are a Democrat because the advancement of the ideology is more important than any type of personal consistency.

The Clinton impeachment taught us a lot about Democrats' true principles:

* It's okay to lie under oath if you don't like the charges.
* It's okay to lie under oath if you don't like who's prosecuting you.
* Defending oneself about lying under oath is "saving the Constitution".
* Sexual harassment is not relevant when the powerful "boss" happens to be a Democrat.
* Ideology trumps any type of misconduct up to and including murder (Condit).
* Ideology trumps any type of minority representation (Clarence Thomas and many others).

Any moral "high road" the liberals might have carried before (and it was quite strong in the wake of the racial and sexual re-order that began in the 1960s) was decimated by the Clinton gang. That capital was spent. No longer can the feminists claim the high road after defending Clinton. And the race baiters are close to being in the same boat after the scandals involving Jackson, Sharpton and Mel Reynolds among others. Suddenly the more-correct-than-thou crowd was out there supporting perjury. Then came 2000 and they were out there defending vote fraud.

That's not to imply that Republicans have clean hands in all of this but the oh-so-serious, oh-so-pious, oh-so-concerned Democrats had their act exposed by their own Elmer Gantry and I believe that is no small reason for why their party is in such disarray now.

[gitmo]

If 19,120 is 33,000 too many, then this guy - despite his impressive credentials - needs to go back and take 3rd Grade math over again.

15,000 from '96 plus 19,120 from 2000 minus 1800 it should have been equals 32,320 or roughly 33,000 too many. It makes sense doesn't it?

He either needs to learn simple math or he needs to learn to construct understandable sentences.

[Fresh Wind]

No attention was paid to the incident in the national press beyond this initial report.

Believe it, or not, this item was actually on the ABC news website. Sure didn't stay long, though.

[Blue Collar Christian]

What I like best about this article is that it shows the Dems are still too stupid to win even when they cheat.

[mamaduck]

yoe, my dad who is just an unofficial lurker wondered this:

I thought this item was something really HOT, and we'd soon see the press establishment and the political culture doing interesting stuff with it. Then, I noted that it is more than three years old, and so far as I am aware no one has taken notice of it. Why do you suppose some Freeper chose to recycle it now?

could you enlighten him? TIA

[Travis McGee]

I could do it. I could also set up a private email working group of freepers to go over my edit. And of course you would get the last chop and veto.

[MattAMiller]

I'd like to see the numbers. How many of these double voted ballots would be expected to contain a vote for Bush and how does that compare to what actually turned up?

[Ichneumon]

* Sexual harassment is not relevant when the powerful "boss" happens to be a Democrat. [snip] Any moral "high road" the liberals might have carried before (and it was quite strong in the wake of the racial and sexual re-order that began in the 1960s) was decimated by the Clinton gang. That capital was spent. No longer can the feminists claim the high road after defending Clinton.

I couldn't agree more.

Despite the excesses of the feminist movement, one of its founders, Gloria Steinem, was almost always level-headed and reasonable, at least in her days of highest prominence.

So it was a major shock when she wrote her "one free grope rule" editorial in the middle of the Clinton scandal, explaining that if a boss grabbed an employees breast or dropped his pants and told her to "kiss it", it wasn't worth making a fuss over as long as he accepted "no thanks" as a response...

Truly astounding.

If I ever meet Ms. Steinem, I think I'll grab her breast as my way of saying "hello" -- and then ask her to sign a copy of her essay.

(Speaking of which, does anyone have a copy? I read it in the newspaper when it originally appeared, but haven't found an electronic copy to save in my archives. Maybe the feminists have hunted down all copies and destroyed them. :-) Similarly, I can no longer find any reference to the following quote, which I copied verbatim from an online CNN story the day it was made: "I have to confess it has crossed my mind that you could not be a Republican and a Christian." -- Hillary Clinton, February 6, 1997. And yes, it was the generic "you", she was not addressing a particular person.)

[Ichneumon]

and include the panhandle votes that were "discouraged" out by the democrat early call for Gore.

...and also discouraged by some news networks falsely announcing that the polls were now closed in Florida, even though they were open in the panhandle for another hour yet (because the panhandle is in a different timezone).

[meatloaf]

Let see. If you add 19,120 + 15,000 you get 34,120. Then subtracting the normal expected error of 1,800 from 34,120 you get 32,320. It's not 33,000 as stated. My guess is the guy did some fast math in his head. If it was me I'd say approximately 30,000 votes.

From my point of view the guy needs a calculator. As for you maybe you need to read it again for comprehension. A rocket you ain't.

[South40]

more voters were being handed new ballots per minute than new voters were being signed in.

Normal dimocRATic politics, to be sure.

[Future Useless Eater]

btt

[maica]

That's not because Republicans don't fight hard enough (although it's true they don't) but because Democrats have no rule of law and are totally shameless.

Not only have they no shame but they can recognize behavior that Should cause shame when committed by a conservative.

Any form of hypocrisy is perfectly allowable if you are a Democrat because the advancement of the ideology is more important than any type of personal consistency.

We understand this much better than we did ten years ago. And yet we still CANNOT over/underestimate how low they can go. We must be alert to all dirty tricks.

Remember the Wellstone Memorial, and trading Torricelli in for Lautenberg?

They have no shame, but a lot of the electorate are turned away by their behavior, which is good news for us and the country.

[XBob]

1 - I remember this excellent analysis by RAC, at the time, and was very impressed.

[Robert A Cook PE]

Thank you.

Hard to find all "copies" out there with this error, but I'll fix it.

[Ciexyz]

"Makes ya sick" bump.