Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LA Couple Arrested for Seeking to Circumcise Girls
reuters via newsmax ^ | 01/09/2004 | Dan Whitcomb

Posted on 01/10/2004 10:11:42 PM PST by TASMANIANRED

Fri January 9, 2004 07:06 PM ET

By Dan Whitcomb LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A Los Angeles man who allegedly offered to circumcise young girls for undercover FBI agents posing as their parents was arrested along with his girlfriend on Friday in what prosecutors said was the first U.S. case of its kind.

Todd Cameron Bertrang and Robyn Faulkinbury -- who prosecutors say met with undercover FBI agents to arrange circumcisions for two fictitious girls -- were taken into custody at their home outside Los Angeles. "The evidence we uncovered about (Bertrang's) lack of medical knowledge and the lack of sanitary facilities would have made this procedure extremely dangerous," said Thom Mrozek, spokesman for the U.S. Attorneys Office in Los Angeles.

An affidavit filed in the case said that Bertrang, 41, referred to the 24-year-old Faulkinbury as his "slave" and told FBI agents they could see her circumcised genitalia.

Faulkinbury was allegedly planning to assist Bertrang in future surgeries, according to the affidavit.

Female circumcision is widespread in parts of Africa, where it is seen as a right of passage to womanhood that limits promiscuity. Health workers describe the practice as female genital mutilation and say it causes long-term physical and psychological damage.

The procedure has been banned in the United States since 1995. Exceptions are made for cases of medical necessity when performed by a doctor.

Prosecutors said there was no evidence that Bertrang and Faulkinbury, who were apparently born in the United States, were acting out of religious or cultural beliefs.

The FBI agents had posed as a married couple who wanted to have their two girls, ages 8 and 12, circumcised on the advice a British friend who had done the same to his daughter.

The affidavit said undercover FBI agents approached Bertrang over the Internet after getting a tip that he had recently circumcised a young girl and had displayed pictures of a surgically altered teenage girl on a Web site.

During a meeting at Bertrang's home the FBI agents said they met a woman named Fran and a man both sitting a bathtub full of brown liquid.

"Bertrang explained that he had just removed Fran's labia and that she was soaking in the tub to aid in her healing after the procedure," the affidavit said. During the execution of a search warrant, Mrozek said, Bertrang told FBI agents that "he had done more of these anybody else in Western world."

The pair could each face five years in prison if convicted.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: femalecircumcision; unliscensedsurgery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2004 10:11:42 PM PST by TASMANIANRED
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED
Sickest of the sick. Mutilation for fun and profit.
2 posted on 01/10/2004 10:15:14 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (black dogs are my life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Free Republic. More Bang For The Buck!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 01/10/2004 10:15:42 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Hi Mom! Hi Dad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED
An affidavit filed in the case said that Bertrang, 41, referred to the 24-year-old Faulkinbury as his "slave" and told FBI agents they could see her circumcised genitalia.

WTF?
4 posted on 01/10/2004 10:16:55 PM PST by Pro-Bush (Homeland Security + Tom Ridge = Open Borders --> Demand Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED
The procedure has been banned in the United States since 1995. Exceptions are made for cases of medical necessity when performed by a doctor.

We should have the same law banning male circumcision

5 posted on 01/10/2004 10:16:56 PM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED
While it is illegal most places, it is really illegal in the US. Human rights violation, too.
6 posted on 01/10/2004 10:19:33 PM PST by RightWhale (How many technological objections will be raised?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
I'll bite. Why?
7 posted on 01/10/2004 10:27:39 PM PST by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
Think about it!

Circumcision is the cutting off of a perfectly healthy body part without the consent of its owner?

Why should that be allowed?

It is only done because of tradition in the US, and is not widely praticed in other places such as Europe.

I am opposed to depriving people of body parts without their consent

8 posted on 01/10/2004 10:36:16 PM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED

9 posted on 01/10/2004 10:40:37 PM PST by dagnabbit (Tell Bush what to do with his Mexico Merger - Write in Tancredo in your State's primary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
I'm glad my parents didn't wait for my approval. I don't think I could have gone through with it.
10 posted on 01/10/2004 10:44:05 PM PST by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
You are right on the $$$ with this one!
11 posted on 01/10/2004 10:47:32 PM PST by Delta 21 (MKC USCG-ret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
Could you give any MEDICAL reasons why it should not be practiced?
12 posted on 01/10/2004 10:50:20 PM PST by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
Could you give any MEDICAL reasons why it should not be practiced?

You have your perspective backwards-you need a medical reason to cut a body part off; not to leave a body part on

In those small number of cases where circumcision is medically justified, of course it should be allowed.

The "hygiene" and "it might cause problems in the future" arguments are bogus, we don't cut out the tonsils and appendices of infants on that basis, do we?

13 posted on 01/10/2004 11:00:32 PM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dagnabbit
Diversity is Perversity!
14 posted on 01/10/2004 11:03:58 PM PST by itsLUCKY2B (“Borders, Language, and Culture.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
OK, genius, what about wisdom teeth?!?

Just kidding.

Nice response.
15 posted on 01/10/2004 11:04:48 PM PST by jra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jra
OK, genius, what about wisdom teeth?!

We wait until wisdom teeth cause a problem before pulling them.

Have you ever heard of wisdom teeth being pulled from a newborn?

Cut men don't want to believe this, but there is a large loss of sensitivity that comes from circumcision.

16 posted on 01/10/2004 11:44:45 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED
OK ... I'll get around to being repulsed as soon as I figure out "HOW?"
17 posted on 01/11/2004 12:02:21 AM PST by Gerasimov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
Yeah ... but I wouldn't wanna walk around with an icky fleshy turtle neck on! Many American women have never seen a so called "in tact" tallywacker and are quite frightened at the site of it.

I'll keep good ol' helmet head...
18 posted on 01/11/2004 12:05:09 AM PST by Gerasimov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gerasimov
It deprives a woman of sexual pleasure,therefore she is not liable to be tempted to have sex before marriage or stray afterwards.
19 posted on 01/11/2004 2:40:05 AM PST by MEG33 (We Got Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
It deprives a woman of sexual pleasure,therefore she is not liable to be tempted to have sex before marriage or stray afterwards.

I suspect an American woman might be dangerous to live with after such a procedure.

There is no comparison between male circumcision as performed in the civilized world and the mutilation of females as practiced in the Middle East and Africa.

20 posted on 01/11/2004 3:09:18 AM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson