FYI -- Marriage still "against the law."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Iron Eagle
Pretty soon, anyone can just 'shack up' (no marriage), and these stupid government politicians who have been 'elected' will completely destroy the foundation of marriage.
To: Iron Eagle
-"To obtain domestic-partner status, a couple have to share a residence and show proof of joint financial status or property ownership or designation of the partner as the beneficiary in a retirement plan or will. I presume that a brother and sister can qualify? How about 2 brothers, 2 sisters? Mother - son? 2 cousins? How about 2 strangers??
To: All
JESUS DEFINES MARRIAGE: "And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore, they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder." -from THE BIBLE: Matthew 19:4-6
International Healing Foundation
8 posted on
01/12/2004 2:01:25 PM PST by
Cindy
To: Iron Eagle
So their crap about just wanting the same legal privileges that married people are entitled to just doesn't hold water anymore? Let's just make this clear: Gays do not intend to stop until they can call it "marriage."
To: Iron Eagle
The Sodomization of America continues.
MM
To: Iron Eagle
This legislation is a matter of fundamental decency," Gov. James E. McGreevey said before signing the law. Decency as defined maybe in Sodom & Gommorah......
11 posted on
01/12/2004 2:08:54 PM PST by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: Iron Eagle
"This legislation is a matter of fundamental decency," Gov. James E. McGreevey said before signing the law.You don't know the meaning of the word "decency" you disgusting waste of a human being. You and the people you represent in signing this piece of trash are the most dishonest, indecent, and revolting bunch of pantywastes I can imagine.
FMCDH
15 posted on
01/12/2004 2:14:03 PM PST by
nothingnew
(The pendulum is swinging and the Rats are in the pit!)
To: Iron Eagle
Everyone in the state sharing an apartment/house/etc. with anyone/thing else, should put in tomorrow for benefits.
16 posted on
01/12/2004 2:17:35 PM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!)
To: Iron Eagle
INTREP - SODOMITE AGENDA ALERT!
To: Iron Eagle
21 posted on
01/12/2004 2:27:23 PM PST by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: Iron Eagle
I would like to propose that freepers refrain from using the oxymoron "gay marriage" as that phrase will eventually debase the meaning of the word marriage. I've already seen "gay marriage" and "straight marriage" used in the same sentence more than I'd like.
In place of "gay marriage" I suggest using the word "sodomiage" [pronounced sodom-midge] which more accurately reflects what these unions entail.
Until a child is conceived from anal copulation, it isn't marriage.
22 posted on
01/12/2004 2:28:45 PM PST by
redfog
To: Iron Eagle
>>A divorcelike proceeding in Superior Court would be necessary to end a domestic partnership.
Hah! Be careful what you wish for.
Lawyers do look out for their own, don't they? Sure we'll give you arrangements but when you're done with them you'll need legal help to get free.
This should discourage most of them. Gay couples will have to weigh the likelihood of hospital privileges against the likelihood of change of heart, and decide whether the union is worth the legal hassle of dissolving it.
To: Iron Eagle
Yeesh, but for what "intent and purposes" is marriage still against the law in NJ? Sounds like all that is taboo any longer is the actual marriage certificate.
To: Iron Eagle; Coleus
Morality aside, look for your health insurance costs to go through the roof-we'll have to pay for their partners AIDS related costs.
26 posted on
01/12/2004 3:25:05 PM PST by
MattinNJ
To: Iron Eagle
The Indiana Court of Appeals just heard arguments in a gay-marriage case today. Whatever the outcome, you KNOW it's going to be appealed to the IN Supremes.
(What was weird to me was that the court was filled with rather attractive women, rather than activist-looking males. I didn't get a chance to stereotype at all! Hmph!!)
To: Iron Eagle
Hmmm. Wonder why Mass and NJ don't recognize my conceal permit, but do recognize my driver and marriage license. Must be a blue state thang.
28 posted on
01/12/2004 3:28:48 PM PST by
glock rocks
(Support Free Republic -- Pray for our Troops -- God bless America)
To: Iron Eagle
"This legislation is a matter of fundamental decency," Gov. James E. McGreevey said before signing the law. He said "decency" in the context of homosexuals. How far we've fallen.
30 posted on
01/12/2004 4:03:02 PM PST by
hattend
(Mr Bush, the Supremes upheld CFR...what's your plan B? Too late to veto, now)
To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping - there was an article about this yesterday (?), I'll try to find the link.
This is the beginning of the deluge. Now there's a suit for polygamy, which actually has a lot more history, scripture, tradition and common sense than same sex marriage!
Rick Santorum is proved right, unfortunately.
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, inform me and it shall be done.
To: Iron Eagle
There is no way we can stop two persons, regardless of gender, who are going to "shack" up with each other.
On the other hand, we must do all in our legal power to stop "same-sex marriages." WHY? The ONLY reason is spousal HEALTH INSURANCE mainly because it is needed to defray the costs of curing AIDS.
Just think of the increase of the cost of insurance if "same-sex marriage" is allowed.
To: Iron Eagle
When the gay lobby realizes that marriage entails monogamy, they'll shriek and run for the woods.
I mean hills. Sorry.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson