Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats' status quo won't work (California)
Mercury News ^ | 1/18/04 | Phil Yost

Posted on 01/18/2004 9:30:55 AM PST by NormsRevenge

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:49:26 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's proposed budget doesn't ``blow up boxes'' as he promised, but at least it lights some fuses.

Legislative Democrats, on the other hand, have responded by crawling into boxes and pulling down the lids. They'll have to do better than crying, ``Save the status quo.''


(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: angelides; burton; calgov2002; california; democrats; nunez; perata; statusquo; unaboxerblowerupper; wontwork

1 posted on 01/18/2004 9:30:55 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *calgov2002; SierraWasp
Ping
2 posted on 01/18/2004 9:38:20 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi Mac ...... /~normsrevenge - FoR California Propositions/Initiatives info...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Democrats don't have to abandon their values to woo taxpayers. They just have to convince them that they have enough appreciation for the people who pay taxes to see that the money will be spent wisely.

This is absolutely wrong.

What the CA government has to do is lower taxes to prevent taxpayers from voting with their feet.

Somewhere along the line the realization that when individuals and companies move out of the state a stream of tax revenue is lost forever just has to dawn on these guys. It is far better to get 80% of what they have now than to get 0%.

3 posted on 01/18/2004 9:41:56 AM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The Democrats are incapable of protecting the taxpayers' interests. To state they can provide better funding for government simultaneously with improved public services is to square the circle. And pigs can fly!
4 posted on 01/18/2004 9:44:17 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
There's no conflict between being for educational opportunity and favoring higher fees for upper-income families sending their children to UC.

How about this little chunk of double taxation. The lower income folks pay very little taxes and low fees, upper income people pay the taxes that support the schools and the f*ing 'RATS want higher fees to use them. Every friggin thing in this state has an extra fee in it to help redistribute wealth.

5 posted on 01/18/2004 9:49:40 AM PST by evolved_rage (All your base are belong to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I propose a 39% California income tax surcharge on the total net income earned by Hollywood Democrats who earned over $1 million last year.
6 posted on 01/18/2004 9:55:47 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
bttt
7 posted on 01/18/2004 10:10:14 AM PST by lainde (Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson