To: Ancesthntr
And you missed the part where he said he would sign it if it reached his desk? How did that happen?
How did all these so-called Second Amendment Activists somehow miss something so important? You weren't discussing this at the campaign headquarters? No one mentioned at the Grassroots meetings?
42 posted on
01/26/2004 8:53:13 AM PST by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Shooter 2.5
Are you certain that Bush
wouldn't sign a renewal? Where is there an unequivocal public statement by him or one of his authorized spokesmen that he
won't sign it? Maybe I've missed that one, too? But I didn't miss what his assistant press secretary said - which was never withdrawn or contradicted.
I only hope that Tom DeLay has the guts to keep this thing bottled up in committee forever - if not, the RINOs will cave and this thing WILL be on Bush's desk...and the man has NEVER yet vetoed a bill.
To: Shooter 2.5
I'm in agreement that President Bush was perfectly clear in his opposition to so-called "AW's" in his campaign for the 2000 election; But it's not the Pres who will pass a bill - its the Congress. I have spent a fair amount of time explaining to the House leadership (in so many words) that IF they are stupid enough to pass a renewal, they are going to lose their majority-ship in Congress and they might very well cause the Pres. to lose his re-election bid. The ball is in their court on this one: and I hope they are not as dumb as the media (and the RAT-bastards) think they are. (By the way, my definition of "AW" is @sswipe - and I think we do need a ban on them.)
72 posted on
01/27/2004 1:03:37 PM PST by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson