Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Polluting cars getting repaired with state's help
Fort Worth Star Telegram ^ | 02/02/2004 | Scott Streater

Posted on 02/02/2004 10:22:54 AM PST by jtminton

When Elizabeth Reed drove to her neighborhood gas station in Arlington last year, she expected her car to pass inspection with no problem.

So Reed, 67, was startled when the mechanic said her 1990 Mazda Protege had failed the emissions test. There were leaks in the exhaust pipe, she was told, and the catalytic converter needed to be replaced.

Reed, who said she earns about $1,100 a month, used her credit card to pay for the repairs. She took the car back for inspection.

It failed again. This time, she was told that the car had a leaking distributor cap and needed a tuneup.

"I said, 'I can't keep doing this,' " she said. "I was crying. Here I am driving around not knowing what to do. I had no more money."

Finally, in desperation, she called the state Department of Public Safety for help. They told her about the AirCheck Texas Vehicle Repair and Replacement Program, which provides money to low-income motorists to repair or replace vehicles that fail the annual emissions tests.

The state provides those who qualify with up to $600 for repair costs or up to $1,000 toward the cost of a cleaner replacement vehicle.

Reed applied for the program, and she received a $600 voucher to help pay for the repairs. A few days later, her car passed inspection.

Reed is one of thousands of residents in the Metroplex to benefit from the Vehicle Repair and Replacement Program, which has become one of the region's most successful clean-air programs.

Since the program started in October 2002, a total of 3,678 cars that failed emissions tests have been repaired. Those repairs, officials estimate, have reduced nitrogen oxides emissions by an average of 70 percent per car.

Nitrogen oxides are the chief man-made component of ground-level ozone. If concentrations are high enough, they can trigger asthma attacks and aggravate emphysema, bronchitis and other respiratory ailments.

Tarrant, Dallas, Collin and Denton counties do not meet federal ozone standards. Areas that do not meet those standards can face sanctions that include regional emissions caps that limit economic development and the loss of tens of millions in federal highway dollars.

Cars, trucks and other road vehicles account for more than half of all smog-producing contaminants in Dallas-Fort Worth, according to federal statistics. Almost all that tailpipe pollution comes from the dirtiest 10 percent of vehicles on the road, officials say.

Getting those cars off the road is crucial if the region is to comply with ozone standards, said Chris Klaus, principal transportation planner for the North Central Texas Council of Governments.

The Council of Governments, a regional planning group, administers the Vehicle Repair and Replacement Program in the region.

"I think the dividends of this program are going to be seen on ozone monitors every year as this program continues to grow and expand," Klaus said.

Dallas-Fort Worth and the Houston area, which have the state's worst ozone problems, are the only regions participating in the program.

It aids motorists who earn less than 200 percent of the federally defined poverty level -- $30,520 a year for a family of three, according to the program's Web site.

When a vehicle fails the annual emissions test, it can be expensive. The average cost to bring a vehicle into compliance with state emissions standards is $480, officials said. For those who qualify for the program, the state pays, on average, $424.

"This program really assists folks on a lower-income level who might otherwise want to help with clean air but are trying to put meat and potatoes on the table for the kids and may not have the money," said Collin County Judge Ron Harris, one of the program's biggest advocates.

In addition, the program has helped replace 166 older vehicles deemed unrepairable. The program provides up to $1,000 toward the cost of a replacement car.

Harris and other officials said that amount could be raised to $2,000 in the next year.

Reed, the Arlington resident, is thankful that the program exists. She remembers how happy she was when her car finally passed inspection.

"I felt so good," she said. "I no longer had to worry about getting pulled over. I feel great when I get in the car now."

For more information about the AirCheck Texas Vehicle Repair and Replacement Program, call toll-free (800) 898-9103.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: dependancy; environment; pollution; taxmoney
Driving is not a right! Why are our tax dollars doing this? As far as I know all of these counties have public transportation. And if you can't afford a new muffler, how are you paying for your liability insurance?
1 posted on 02/02/2004 10:22:58 AM PST by jtminton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jtminton
amazing that the car passed only AFTER the 600 grant came in. wonder if the program was run by the garage.
2 posted on 02/02/2004 10:26:08 AM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jtminton
Are there any statistics on whether the emissions inspection program does any good? Frankly, it's just a program for each state to get extra money. It's a boondoggle, a farce to squeeze more money from the consumer.
3 posted on 02/02/2004 10:29:21 AM PST by lilylangtree (Olde English takes a long time to say, and we never say anything unless it takes a long time to say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jtminton
Socialism sucks.
4 posted on 02/02/2004 10:29:26 AM PST by TexasRepublic (Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle
I am suspicious about the "leaking distributor cap". I thought the distributor was an electrical component, and not part of the fuel/emission system. But I could be wrong.
5 posted on 02/02/2004 10:32:42 AM PST by Fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jtminton
Driving is not a right! Why are our tax dollars doing this? As far as I know all of these counties have public transportation. And if you can't afford a new muffler, how are you paying for your liability insurance?

If the state is going to mandate cleaner air standards than were in effect at the time a car was manufactured, then the state can pony up the cost to keep the car in compliance.

If that sucks, then maybe so does your state government.

Complain to them. They're the people who are allowing these regulations to go into effect.

6 posted on 02/02/2004 10:36:17 AM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jtminton
leaking distributor cap ..


I bet she was low on blinker fluid also.
7 posted on 02/02/2004 10:42:58 AM PST by PeterPrinciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fudd
you are not wrong, but distributor caps can leak current if they're cracked or damaged.
8 posted on 02/02/2004 10:47:26 AM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
She also needed new muffler bearings.
9 posted on 02/02/2004 10:50:28 AM PST by jtminton (2Timothy 4:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
I'd suggest that they also make sure she has enough muffler grease. You can never have too much muffler grease.
10 posted on 02/02/2004 10:52:28 AM PST by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fudd
I am suspicious about the "leaking distributor cap". I thought the distributor was an electrical component, and not part of the fuel/emission system. But I could be wrong.

A bad distributor cap can cause the engine to misfire, raising hydrocarbon levels dramatically, and causing her cataclysmic converter to work overtime. That could burn it out - and also increase its temperature, upping the danger of a fire.

(I know it's catalytic.)

11 posted on 02/02/2004 10:54:23 AM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker
If the state is going to mandate cleaner air standards than were in effect at the time a car was manufactured, then the state can pony up the cost to keep the car in compliance.

That's not the case. The car has to meet requirements based on the date of manufacture, make model, etc.

What this is is simply another fleece the "rich" to subsidize the "poor" scheme. Including, of course, illegal alien "poor".

12 posted on 02/02/2004 11:02:44 AM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jtminton
The amount of money that people pay for car repairs boggles my mind.
13 posted on 02/02/2004 11:15:17 AM PST by Jack of all Trades
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jtminton
Nitrogen oxides are the chief man-made component of ground-level ozone. If concentrations are high enough, they can trigger asthma attacks and aggravate emphysema, bronchitis and other respiratory ailments.

Oh no...guess we cant run straight open pipes on our cadillac 500 cube motors at the next demolition derby..don't want to cause an asthma attack in the grand stands...


14 posted on 02/02/2004 12:03:32 PM PST by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimt
That's not the case. The car has to meet requirements based on the date of manufacture, make model, etc.

What this is is simply another fleece the "rich" to subsidize the "poor" scheme. Including, of course, illegal alien "poor".

It sounds like you're out of touch with what's been happening. What you describe is how the "old" system worked.

In the state in which I reside, they've been tightening up the standards in an effort to get the older cars off the roads. What was acceptable smog standards last year is not acceptable this year. (See: Smog Check II)

My truck never had a problem passing a smog test until the Smog Check II standards went into effect, then suddenly, it failed the tests. It cost a pretty penny to bring the vehicle into compliance with the new, stricter standards.

While I think this lady was being fleeced by a dishonest garage (A leaking distributor?! Puh-leeze) who was brought into line by the spectre of state action, the gist of the article is accurate.

But, look on the bright side. Smog Check II standards are coming to a state near you...

15 posted on 02/02/2004 12:25:28 PM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker
It sounds like you're out of touch with what's been happening. What you describe is how the "old" system worked.

In California. I'm talking about Texas.

Ours are based on year/make/model. Yet we also have the wealth transfer fee added to our inspection costs.

I'm tired of subsidizing the "poor".

16 posted on 02/02/2004 1:56:54 PM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jimt
In California. I'm talking about Texas.

Like I said, coming soon to a state near you.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Texas didn't used to have smog laws, but now they do. Where did they come from if not California?

If you're tired of paying for the poor now, just wait til Bush's medi-fleece and non-amnesty amnesty programs kick in. You only thought you knew "tired of..."

17 posted on 02/02/2004 3:22:34 PM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker
If you're tired of paying for the poor now, just wait til Bush's medi-fleece and non-amnesty amnesty programs kick in. You only thought you knew "tired of..."

You've certainly got that right.

18 posted on 02/02/2004 3:33:31 PM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jack of all Trades
I was quoted ~ $650.00 labor by more than one shop to change the spark plugs in my 95 'olds Aurora. Additionally, the plugs cost about 20 bucks a pop.

After I finished laughing I asked them what they were smoking. At that point they showed me their maintenance book that said you had to disconnect the transmission from the rest of the drive train and take the engine off its mounts to change the plugs. You take the man-hours it takes to do all this and multiply it by their charge per hour and you get about 650.

So I studied my engine compartment one weekend and found I could get my body and limbs to contort enough to change all eight plugs without removing too many of the gizmos crammed in there. Mind you this wasn't in a garage but in my apartment's parking lot.

So I then ordered the 20 dollar plugs (only mucho-expensiveo AC-Delco plugs would work, I tried others, boy did I try) and changed them my self. I had to buy some weird socket extensions from Sears and I probably left a quarter pound of my skin and blood under the hood but I got it finished in about four hours.

One month later the electronic fuel injector went out on me. Followed by the water pump, AC, other assorted electronic problems, and a radio that ate CDs like they were popcorn. I can't describe how much I hated that car.

19 posted on 02/02/2004 5:07:37 PM PST by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper
Amazing how design for maintenance is not high on the design priority list for some cars, huh? The plugs in your car probabably had a replacement period of 100K miles, so I can understand a little pressure to give up accessibility, but not to the point of requiring an engine removal. It's possible that the plug swap at the dealer was intended to be coupled with other involved maintenance procedures, like timing belt replacement for instance.

In any case, you've proven to yourself that it's possible to do the job with a little blood sweat and tears. Here's a tip for you should $120 for plugs become more dear than 4 hours of your time. You can use copper plugs in place of the spec'd Platinum ones if you're willing to shorten the replacement interval to about 30K miles. Platinum gives no performance advantage other than the 100K endurance.

In my own case, I've never found a garage that didn't try to charge me 10X what I new the job could be done for, or break something else while doing a repair. The last time I tried the quote was $800 to replace the entire rear brake system on my wife's car when all it needed was $40 worth of pads and a little brake cleaner.

With the long winded rant done, IMHO it's insane for states to provide a Medicare style river of cash for emissions repairs. Especially when the same garage doing the testing does the repairs. It would be far better for states to provide alternative registration for non-compliant cars like collectibles, buy and crush the real junk, and institute emissions trading credits for the rest of us.
20 posted on 02/03/2004 3:10:26 AM PST by Jack of all Trades
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson