Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chance33_98
If it comes down to a Constitutional ammendment that marriage should be between a man and a woman, it better have a clause in it that it refers to a genetic man and woman.
Otherwise the lawyers are gonna have a field day defining "Man" and "Woman."

Also the crowd that thinks you can walk into a garden and take an axe to a prickly pear(pair?) and make it a rose bush will have to be taken into account.


62 posted on 02/05/2004 12:10:16 PM PST by N. Theknow (John Kerry is nothing more than Ted Kennedy without a dead girl in the car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: N. Theknow
Good point...LOL.
66 posted on 02/05/2004 12:18:05 PM PST by Lady Eileen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: N. Theknow
If it comes down to a Constitutional ammendment that marriage should be between a man and a woman, it better have a clause in it that it refers to a genetic man and woman.

Actually, if you realized how many different ways a person's gender can be messed up during their time in the womb, you would realize that genetics is not the single detremining factor in gender. Hormones play a major role also.

Otherwise the lawyers are gonna have a field day defining "Man" and "Woman."

I have been trying to state this for a while now.

68 posted on 02/05/2004 12:26:11 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup (Voting for a lesser evil is still an evil act and therefore evil...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson