To: MEG33; sauropod; JohnGalt; Burkeman1; mr.pink; A. Pole; sheltonmac; billbears; steve50
Thanks for the ping to this article MEG33. I disected the column in post #107 in case you're interested. The rest of you might find this of interest as well.
cordially,
109 posted on
02/16/2004 4:44:38 PM PST by
u-89
To: u-89
I have a supply of tin foil in case of emergencies.
110 posted on
02/16/2004 4:51:40 PM PST by
MEG33
(John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
To: u-89
Funny thing. I said the reasons for the war in Iraq were the basically the ones Krauthammer points out in this article months before the war began (namely intellectual gobbliy guk)! And I was attacked on this site for not believeing the WMD fako line for soccer moms!!!
But the majority of Americans believed we went to war because Iraq was a threat to us over the WMD issue. Men are dead and many more without limbs and wonded for life not based on Mr. Krauthammer's arguments but on others that now (and never did) stand the light of day.
To: u-89
This was my favorite:
"Then there is realism, which has the clearest understanding of the new unipolarity and its uses--unilateral and preemptive if necessary. But in the end, it fails because it offers no vision. "
Realism offers no vision so it fails? These people are insane Marxists to the point of making up words(unipolarity???) but at least they are admitting it.
112 posted on
02/16/2004 4:54:10 PM PST by
JohnGalt
("...but both sides know who the real enemy is, and, my friends, it is us.')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson