[FBD]

I'll say the same thing to you, as I said to John Galt:

"The evidence is steadily mounting terrorist links to Saddam. One must look at all the evidence to come to an honest conclusion.

Just because you don’t like the source, or it doesn’t line up with your personal beliefs, doesn’t change the evidence.

If the Weekly Standard had a story about the lack of WMD’s in Iraq, then you would probably be the first to praise them. That’s not very intellectually honest."

Regards

[billbears]

If the Weekly Standard had a story about the lack of WMD’s in Iraq, then you would probably be the first to praise them

But the fact is they won't. Not until the neocons are tired of using the Republican party for their best interests. The evidence is not mounting. What the evidence, contrary to the Weekly Standard and 24 hours of Fox News, shows is that Al Qaeda is entering into Iraq after the fall of Hussein and that Hussein did not want his troops to work with the Islamic crazies. Fox News even stated that back when he was caught in some released letter IIRC.

An honest conclusion would accept that David Kay is not a turncoat and that the WMDs were destroyed, are no longer there, and probably weren't there in the levels we were told in the first place. A partisan answer would believe that against mounting evidence that WMDs can't be found they must still be there or shipped off to Syria or Iran

[roses of sharon]

Saddam and Sons's defense team is on board.

Never forget the real evil is Bush/Cheney/and their Jewish cabal.

Saddam and Sons would never, ever, ever, ever, for the last 25 years associate themselves with AQ, remember Saddam and Sons were saintly secularists.

Which means that Islamic suicide cults, who's goal it is to kill Americans, Christians, Jews, damage US and Israeli cities and financial markets, were completely out of step with Saddam and Sons.

For they only wanted peace, and to be left alone.

[hoosiermama]

Did you see this?

BUMP

[Mr. Buzzcut]

Save your keystrokes.

[JohnGalt]

There has never been a question that Saddam's government had "links" (an ill defined term) to terrorism.

Why are you moving the 'goal posts'?