To: *bang_list
"Although I voted against the ban a decade ago, over the past 10 years it has reduced crime dramatically and has made our streets safer," Warner said. "The legislation also has protected the rights of gun owners better than many of us predicted."
!!!!!!!!
3 posted on
02/24/2004 6:00:17 PM PST by
absalom01
To: absalom01
"The legislation also has protected the rights of gun owners better than many of us predicted."How can Senator Warner move his mouth, make sounds and say such nonsense? How have I as a gun owner been protected by the AWB? NOT!
Apparently the good Senator has suffered a half-heimers attack. He somehow believes his gun owning citizens are complete fools. They are if this pathetic old clown is re-elected!
11 posted on
02/24/2004 6:09:23 PM PST by
toddst
To: absalom01
The newspapers need to be reminded that this is a "so-called" Assault Weapons Ban. They never hesitate to refer to the partial birth abortion ban as the "so-called partial birth abortion ban" because they favor killing all the babies they can get away with killing.
Why is this law (which is really a "Cosmetic Gun Features" ban)treated differently and given such credibility?
By calling it an Assault Weapons Ban, they set the terms of the debate---who could be in favor of ordinary people owning fearsome Assault Weapons (which most people think must be machine guns)?
30 posted on
02/24/2004 6:27:49 PM PST by
07055
To: absalom01; Reelect President Dubya
Someone needs to take Warner to the woodshed for a talking to. I would do it, but I am not near him.
134 posted on
02/25/2004 6:51:26 AM PST by
looscnnn
(Tell me something, it's still "We the people", right? -- Megadeth (Peace Sells))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson