Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Falsely Accused - Sexual Harassment #2
2/24/04 | FrustratedPDX

Posted on 02/24/2004 8:11:12 PM PST by FrustratedPDX

Continuation of "Falsely accused":

One of our former employee recently told us that, the claimant told her that they can make money on us and asked her to join this sexual harassment scam. She said she told her it's wrong and refused the proposition.

Anyway, we got a lawyer who worked many of these cases before.

We showed him all the paperwork and gave information such as the claimant is a habitual accuser and all the people who gave nagative coments to the investigator told lie, one way or other, which we will be able to prove.

Guess what he said!!!: Bottom line is it is not worth fighting over it. And he will help us negotiate to pay her off as less as possible.

Even though State did poor and unfair investigation and listed only rumours as facts and we may be able to prove them however he knows State will not change its position once they decided their position. It will just cost us extra money.

Also, he said State is protected and we can't sue State. On top of it, people who lied will not be sued since they did not make those statements under oath. (So it's OK to lie??)

According to this lawyer there's no win situation for us. He said small businesses are often targeted to these claims. And trying to prove we are right will just cost us more money.

I couldn't believe this!!!!! Do you? Where's justice??


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: falselyaccused; sexualharassment; unfair

1 posted on 02/24/2004 8:11:13 PM PST by FrustratedPDX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FrustratedPDX
Nowadays there are LOTS of innocent companies that just pay up instead of fighting. Its amazing.
2 posted on 02/24/2004 8:25:24 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrustratedPDX
Can you link to the first part of this story, i'd really like to know the particulars, and the actions that were taken. Sorry i missed the first part.
3 posted on 02/24/2004 9:28:22 PM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrustratedPDX
I would send a letter to the editor with the names of the accusers to every newspaper within 500 miles.
4 posted on 02/24/2004 10:21:32 PM PST by B4Ranch (Nobody can make you feel inferior without your consent.--Eleanor Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord
Here is the link....
5 posted on 02/24/2004 10:23:54 PM PST by stands2reason (Liberal lurkers: stick around, you may just grow a brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason; FrustratedPDX
Here is the link....

Thanks much!

TO: FrustratedPDX.

i am afraid that i agreee with the advice you got in the first thread. You can not afford to not have a lawyer on this matter. Perhaps you cannot sue the state, but you can sue the plantiff in civil court. i see no other way for you to regain the good name of your business and your husband's reputation.

You should be aggressive, and non-compromising. Do not settle. Perhaps you can even recover your legal fees if the complaintant against you is found to be laible for her statements. Point being that you need a LAWYER!!!, not a bunch of amature posters from FreeRepublic giving you advice. Some of us are Lawyers, most are not, and others only think they are ;^)

i believe that the insurance company needs your permission to settle. Keep in mind that they also have an agenda...to keep their expenses as low as possible, not to work for your good. This might be the basis behind their advice. Like it or not, you need your own lawyer, and you should refer the entire issue to him/her...yeah, try for a female lawyer, it has it's benefits.

6 posted on 02/24/2004 10:57:34 PM PST by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
You're right...if you recall the Jesse Jackson shake-downs, they all end up caving instead of fighting him in court, in front of specially chosen jurors. The precedent has been set, so it makes it easier for others to cave in, instead of being the first company to publically lose it all and go through all the false accusations that will stick in many peoples' minds, even after being proven wrong. These lawyers have learned their tricks well.
7 posted on 02/24/2004 11:23:05 PM PST by Shery (S. H. in APOland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson