Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie
This seems inconsistent with your proposal to bar couples who don't plan to have children from getting married. If your objective is to tie marriage to children in all cases (to the extent that the elderly couldn't marry), how do you justify allowing younger people who can't have children to get or stay married?
174 posted on 02/27/2004 9:57:22 PM PST by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: ellery
This seems inconsistent with your proposal to bar couples who don't plan to have children from getting married.

It's not.

If your objective is to tie marriage to children in all cases (to the extent that the elderly couldn't marry), how do you justify allowing younger people who can't have children to get or stay married?

Ever heard of adoption? How about IVF? ICSI? If your intent is to raise children, there is no reason to believe that it can't be accommodated, especially when the supply of adoptable children under the policy would increase rather markedly. The point is for children to have parents. It's that important.

175 posted on 02/27/2004 10:07:56 PM PST by Carry_Okie (And the Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson