I agree. Didn't Rosie O'Donnell's speech on our courthouse steps today turn your stomachs as she blithely cast aside thousands of years of tradition and said "she had her rights?" I have nothing against her and Kelli on a personal level, but she's now saying she has a right to demand that as a citizen of California that I must support her lifestyle with my tax dollars, the time of my elected and appointed officials (who should be concerned with other, more important matters), and my moral blessing.
She and Kelli must get none of the above. The lines are drawn. Even tolerant people like me are unable to agree to these terms.
The state has no interest in same sex "long term dating." What these mean-spirited people are doing in the name of "love" is demanding our resignation. They are already winning the right to teach our children in school that morals taught at home are simply obsolete. Now they want it on TV, in church, in the chambers of our justices of peace, and in our divorce courts.
This is nothing short of a rebellion, and it is not tantamount to abolition. They want to enslave us to their experimental morals. She wants to take my right to withold support for her lifestyle and crush it under her thick, black jackboots.
I say to every one of you: this must not stand.
Rosie championing a betrayal of another essential liberty.