Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kozak
Neither a lawyer nor a liberal. Just tired of people throwing stones in glass houses.

It would be quite easy to change divorce laws, but I see no effort to do that. And that is the primary problem for children. But, as changing divorce laws would be a solution that would limit the choices for a majority of us, better to go for the easy mark and just limit the choices of others, and claim that the problem is fixed.

I guess the next couple of years will determine if society goes to hell in a handbasket because gay people get married. When the gay folk who do get married in those few places where they will be allowed to move out and become neighbors to us straight married folk, we will see just how much worse the lives of children become.

In the meantime, you go about your business, rasin hell about gay folk gettin married, while the lives of children are being wrecked, not by gay marriage, but by divorce.
193 posted on 02/28/2004 11:42:53 AM PST by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]


To: BikerNYC
Another straw man to be set up and knocked down by yourself. Change divorce law? The same judicial tyranny that has been busy inventing a right to gay marriage would overrule any law that restricted divorce.

Massachusetts has had a constitution for 2 centuries and SUDDENLY a few judges discover a "right" to gay marriage.
The reason marriage is not spelled out as a union of man and woman in our laws is that the concept was so self evident, that no one thought to codify it in the law. Just like no one thought to specify marriage didn't apply to the live stock .

California overwhelmingly passes a law defining marriage and a local official thumbs his nose at the law and the court refuses to act. Nothing as simple as a law will overturn that, the justices, our masters, have spoken.

Just when did we pass a law legalizing abortion in the US? It was illegal, by law in almost every state when the SCOTUS discovered an "implied right" in the "penumbra" of a right to privacy.

And once those "few areas" legalize it, you know damn well the SCOTUS will force the recognition of those marriages in EVERY state because of Article VI "full faith and credit clause" in the constitution.

The same groups pushing the gay agenda are those that have relentlessly championed every other assault on marriage. Now that those have born their bitter fruit, they move on and make the very concept of marriage an obscene joke.

Cause thats what's really going on here. It's not about marriage per se, thats the smoke screen. It's about trying to get us all to have to accept homosexuality as normal and acceptable. THATS the real agenda here.


194 posted on 02/28/2004 12:44:58 PM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson