Replies

I've read through a number of your posts, and frankly I don't know how to take you. Are you supporting Kerry, or just pointing out that attacks on him will have to be better authenicated than they are now in this area?

Better authentication.

People like to think they have Kerry figured out and "he was lying" and don't do their homework. Then some spokesman gets a moment on TV and looks like a sincere moron who doesn't know what he thinks he knows, and Kerry wins again.

The WSI has not been debunked, at least not that I've seen. Not verified enough for some, ok, buts thats an ongoing discussion, not a slam-dunk reversal.

The dramatic claim that the WSI witnesses have been proven to be non-vets or to have lied about specific events doesn't hold up. So far.

I don't support Kerry because I think of him as too gullible for the cause of the day. He has some talent as a character actor, but we'd be better off if he confined that to community theater.