From left to right, Terry McAuliffe, Ted Kennedy, John Edwards, John Kerry, and Hillary Clinton (or is that Teresa?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: William McKinley
We're DOOMED!
2 posted on
03/14/2004 6:31:55 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
To: William McKinley
Is that the movie where the sh!t hits the fan - literally?
4 posted on
03/14/2004 6:37:00 AM PST by
alnitak
("That kid's about as sharp as a pound of wet liver" - Foghorn Leghorn)
To: William McKinley
One Word: Nuanced
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
</sarcasm>
5 posted on
03/14/2004 6:38:30 AM PST by
DoctorMichael
(What the %$#&!)
To: William McKinley
Roger Murdock: We have clearance Clarence.
Captain Oveur: Roger, Roger. What's our vector Victor?
Tower voice: Tower's radio clearance, over!
Captain Oveur: That's Clarence Oveur! Oveur.
Tower voice: Roger.
Roger Murdock: Huh?
Tower voice: Roger, over.
Roger Murdock: Huh?
Captain Oveur: Huh?
6 posted on
03/14/2004 6:42:50 AM PST by
FormerACLUmember
(JF'nK = major POS and waste of oxygen)
To: William McKinley
I'm "foragainst" bumping this great article to the top. Thanks!
Lando
To: William McKinley
This essay is brilliantly oblique in it's clarity, yet translucently definitive, while achieving random dissonance. Unfortunately, it IS vintage Kerry.
This having appeared in the NYT, I'll be retiring with my ice skates to Hell, which has certainly frozen over.
8 posted on
03/14/2004 6:49:29 AM PST by
Spok
To: William McKinley
Kerry established himself early as the senator most likely to pierce through the superficial clarity and embrace the miasma. David Brooks shure talks purty. :D
To: William McKinley
"the realm of Post-Cartesian Multivariate Co-Directionality"
Bwaaahaha!!! AND, "which admittedly sounds better in the original French, Kerry exclaimed: (well since no-one has done it yet, I'll oblige);
"Nous savons de nos tentatives en grande partie non réussies de enrôler la coopération d'autres nations, particulièrement nations marchandes industrialisées, dans les efforts d'imposer et imposer des normes légèrement positif ambitieuses sur des nations telles que l'Iran, la Chine, la Birmanie et la Syrie, ces la bonne volonté de la plupart des autres nations - y compris un nombre qui sont associés aux sanctions à l'isolat Irak - n'est ni au loin ni s'associer profondément aux sanctions imposer sur une nation souveraine pour la stimuler à haut propre de ` son acte 'et comport ses actions avec des normes internationales admises."
Gee, I don't know? Maybe the english version is MORE nonsensical - or is it just more of his 'nuance'?
Which BTW is the french word for 'moderate'.
11 posted on
03/14/2004 6:56:15 AM PST by
Condor51
("Diplomacy without arms is like music without instruments." -- Frederick the Great)
To: William McKinley; sauropod
As Kerry noted, "I think that the president today made the right decision to try to establish a process which will maintain the capacity of our forces, protect them, and to disengage while simultaneously upholding the mission we have set out to accomplish."
To: William McKinley
oxymoronically gifted junior senator from Massachusetts
From the NYT? Made my morning! Thanks...
13 posted on
03/14/2004 7:01:05 AM PST by
Centaur
(Never practice moderation to excess.)
To: William McKinley
Kerry has made clear that if he is elected president, the nation will never face a caveat shortage. Great article. Painfully true.
It's telling that the one issue where he gains clarity is in killing unborn babies.
14 posted on
03/14/2004 7:14:05 AM PST by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: William McKinley
Excuse me while I go PUKE!
15 posted on
03/14/2004 7:22:11 AM PST by
Khuey
To: William McKinley
In a characteristic sentence, which admittedly sounds better in the original FrenchTouché. That'll leave a mark.
To: William McKinley
the realm of Post-Cartesian Multivariate Co-Directionality
ROFLMAO!
19 posted on
03/14/2004 7:45:25 AM PST by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: William McKinley
Well, I needed my nose cleaned out by my coffee this morning. But how do I get it off my keyboard and monitor?
What a great article. A classic to be sure.
20 posted on
03/14/2004 7:45:56 AM PST by
Laserman
To: William McKinley
Once you cut through the political double speak, the snake oil sun tan lotion of an oily politician, his meaning is perfectly clear.
Just because liberal's, such as himself, are forced by circumstances, and fear of voter backlash, to vote for the approval of military action, is in no way to be construed by the president or others that live in the alternate universe of political intrigue, in the land of smoke and mirrors, as a sincere vote.
Therefore, this psudo permission to use the military, should not be taken advantage of by the President, by actually using the military to engage an enemy.
Their vote is to appease the unwashed masses, and to not appear anti-American or weak on national defense. When liberal politicians find themselves boxed in by events such as 9-11, or public opinion, it's is highly unethical for the President to take advantage of their plight and actually defend America.
To: William McKinley
Kerry is stupid.
23 posted on
03/14/2004 8:15:51 AM PST by
punster
(q)
To: William McKinley
"Again and again and again in the debate, it was made clear that the vote of the U.S. Senate and the House on the authorization of immediate use of force on Jan. 12 was not a vote as to whether or not force should be used."
Deja Voooodoooo all over again.
To: William McKinley
BTTT
To: William McKinley
ForAgainst BTTT.
31 posted on
03/14/2004 11:18:33 AM PST by
spodefly
(The kinder, gentler spodefly.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson