/sarcasm
Posted on 03/23/2004 5:00:40 PM PST by Eurotwit
WASHINGTON, 24 March 2004 — Last week I became involved in a controversy with the Bush re-election committee. The dispute was over a new television advertisement released by President Bush’s campaign that, I believe, negatively stereotypes Arabs. Supporters of the president said I was wrong. They said I was being overly sensitive, creating an issue where none existed. And when I persisted, they said I was objecting merely because I was a Democrat and, therefore, my criticism was nothing more than partisan politics.
The truth is quite the opposite. The ad is wrong, insensitive and harmful to Arab Americans. It should be changed.
Let me explain.
The actual text of the 30-second ad is a quite simple and direct attack on Bush’s Democratic challenger, Sen. John Kerry. Kerry is criticized for being weak on defense, taxes and terrorism.
The ad begins with President Bush saying, “I’m George W. Bush and I approve this message.”
Then a woman’s voice narrates the rest of the ad saying,
“A president sets his agenda for America in the first 100 days.
“John Kerry’s plan: To pay for new government spending, raise taxes by at least $900 billion.
“On the War on Terror: Weaken the Patriot Act used to arrest terrorists and protect America. And he wanted to delay defending America until the United Nations approved.
“John Kerry: Wrong on taxes. Wrong on defense.”
When the narrator says the line “on the war on terror...” the words — “John Kerry’s Plan” ... “Weaken Fight Against Terrorists” — flash on the screen. Three pictures unfold in sequence, each taking up one-third of the screen. The first is of a traveler in an airport followed by a person in a chemical-weapons suit. The final sequence is of an unidentified, but clearly Middle Eastern looking, young man slowly turning his head and looking menacingly into the camera.
What troubled me was the way the ad used a young Middle Eastern-looking male to evoke fear of terrorists. This was negative stereotyping at its worst and, as I wrote to the campaign manger of the president’s re-election effort, it “undercuts the message of tolerance that President Bush issued to the nation in the wake of Sept. 11th...the use of this type of imagery can only reinforce and build upon the fear and suspicion that law-abiding Arab Americans and Arab immigrants are already subject to.”
If the ad had used the face of Osama Bin Laden, Mohammed Atta, or even Timothy McVeigh, I wouldn’t have objected. But the use of what appeared to be a young Middle Eastern man was a different matter. I have sons who look like that young man. There are US soldiers who look like him too. In fact there are millions of Americans (of many ethnicities) and many more over the world who look like that face in the ad.
That is what is wrong with negative stereotyping and racial profiling. And that is why the president was right to insist that the campaign against terror was not about Arabs or Muslims in general. Rather it was about a small group of terrorists. I, therefore, concluded my letter with a simple request that the campaign merely change that one image. The campaign’s response was disappointing and disingenuous. The face was not an Arab, they said. It was an Italian American actor. They said that they were not intending to portray an Arab or Muslim — just a young man. Then, as if to make my point, a Bush campaign spokesperson said, “the images in the ad fairly represent the challenges and threats we face”! Now I know this business well enough to know that the content of the 30-second ad was quite deliberate. Every frame, every word, every photo was designed and tested for maximum impact. And that is why I was concerned.
The visual of a young man turning and giving a menacing look into the camera at the mention of the words “arrest terrorists and protect America” was intended to evoke fear — and the object of that fear was the young Middle-Eastern looking man.
This was precisely what we had to fight against after Sept. 11. The backlash of fear, suspicion and violence directed against people who merely looked Arab was quite terrifying. In some cases the victims of this backlash were Hispanic, Greek, Indian or Sikh — all because of how they looked.
As my objections became public, I responded to press queries, engaged in some media debates and received e-mails that only reinforced my concerns. “Aren’t the terrorists all Arabs?” or “who else should we be afraid of?” was a common refrain of those who wrote and called.
My criticism is not wrong, nor is it a case of my being overly sensitive or partisan. It is based on my awareness of the impact that negative stereotyping has had on Arab Americans and my concern that it is now being reinforced by a group acting on behalf of the president of the United States.
— Dr. James J. Zogby is president of the Arab American Institute. For comments or information, contact jzogby@aaiusa.org or http://www.aaiusa.org.
/sarcasm
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but we weren't attacked by Swedes, were we?
Oh, the indescribable horror of dirty looks and being forced to listen to other people bless America!
This is where I stopped reading. How many non-Middle-Eastern-looking male terrorists have attacked America?
Gee, name one positive stereotype about arabs!
I can't think of a single thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.