Skip to comments.
Shotgun Justice
The Wall Street Journal ^
| April 7, 2004
| Masthead Editorial
Posted on 04/08/2004 6:02:17 PM PDT by neverdem
Edited on 04/22/2004 11:51:28 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
While the tabloids were having a field day recently with the signals a juror in the Tyco trial was allegedly flashing, elsewhere in Manhattan lawyers for the firearms industry were asking the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to recuse a judge they say is sending his own "OK" signal to plaintiffs in a highly contentious gun case.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; beretta; firearmliability; guncontrol; jackweinstein; naacp; newyorkcity; nyc; productliability; secondamendment
1
posted on
04/08/2004 6:02:18 PM PDT
by
neverdem
To: fourdeuce82d; Travis McGee; Joe Brower; archy
BANG
2
posted on
04/08/2004 6:09:47 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: All
Help prevent this type of Air Force One NIGHTMARE from EVER happening again!
Support Free Republic!!! |
Click Here to Donate to Free Republic By Secure Server
Or mail checks to: FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
Or you can use: PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- Found in the breaking news sidebar! Fawnn
|
3
posted on
04/08/2004 6:10:32 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: neverdem; *bang_list
Posted to *bang_list
4
posted on
04/08/2004 6:22:53 PM PDT
by
Copernicus
(A Constitutional Republic revolves around Sovereign Citizens, not citizens around government.)
To: BOBWADE
ping
5
posted on
04/08/2004 9:03:28 PM PDT
by
zip
(Monthly donations are the easiest way to say Thanks for FR)
To: neverdem
The original case was NAACP v. Acusport, in which the NAACP sued a large group of gun manufacturers, importers and distributors on the grounds that the industry represented a public nuisance because it allowed its firearms to fall into the hands of criminals. As the National Law Journal stated baldly, lawyers targeting the gun industry steer their cases to Judge Weinstein because they know they "might not succeed in any other courtroom in America." In order to circumvent possible financial losses due to NAACP's current Lawsuit against Gun Manufacturers, Dealers, and Distributors, we are FORCED to halt ALL firearm, and accessory sales to ALL persons of Color. If this position seems unfair might I suggest you contact the NAACP and discuss the ramifications that THEIR actions are having on YOUR enjoyment and the exercising of YOUR Second Amendment Rights.
NAACP
4805 Mt. Hope Drive
Baltimore Maryland 21215
Toll Free: (877)NAACP-98
NAACP 24 Hour Hotline
(410) 521-4939
Email: washingtonbureau@naacpnet.org
--Second Amendment Gun Shop, Vienna, Illinois, 62995</i<
6
posted on
04/08/2004 10:04:56 PM PDT
by
archy
(The darkness will come. It will find you,and it will scare you like you've never been scared before.)
To: archy
In order to circumvent possible financial losses due to NAACP's current Lawsuit against Gun Manufacturers, Dealers, and Distributors, we are FORCED to halt ALL firearm, and accessory sales to ALL persons of Color. If this position seems unfair might I suggest you contact the NAACP and discuss the ramifications that THEIR actions are having on YOUR enjoyment and the exercising of YOUR Second Amendment Rights. Well you can always dream. Just say a prayer the circuit court recuses Weinstein. Since he's been overturned on appeal in all of his cases regarding the 2nd Amendment that have been reviewed by the 2nd Circuit Court, IIRC, and that the 5th Circuit and the Justice Dept. believes in an individual right, this clown is wasting his time and our taxes.
7
posted on
04/08/2004 10:35:42 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: neverdem; fourdeuce82d; Travis McGee; Joe Brower; archy
"...The original case was NAACP v. Acusport, in which the NAACP sued a large group of gun manufacturers, importers and distributors on the grounds that the industry represented a public nuisance because it allowed its firearms to fall into the hands of criminals..."The strangest thing of all in this is that Black People, living in the highest crime areas, will be denied access to firearms to protect themselves from violent armed criminals.
The irony is humongous...............FRegards
8
posted on
04/09/2004 7:37:09 PM PDT
by
gonzo
(Y'know, crime just don't pay like it used to..............)
To: gonzo
Irony is several mental steps beyond the grasp of the gun grabbers.
9
posted on
04/09/2004 8:01:21 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson