[ValerieUSA]

Errors? LIES!

[MEG33]

Clarke,padding his part,arrogant and wrong on the actual events...but not sloppy with the truth?

[Eala]

Martha Levin, a publicist at Free Press, the Simon & Schuster Shyster subsidiary that published "Against All Enemies," said Clarke had no comment about the errors. "Free Press makes it a policy not to discuss internal editorial processes lies published by Free Press," she said.

[AmericanVictory]

Uh, "Mistakes have been made," but attacking the truth tellers is more important. What do lies matter when you're on the Democrat side?

[TexasCajun]

I think I like this guy, Mike Carter.

[river rat]

Clark lied?
I'm shocked....NOT.

He's a democrat, a Clinton admirer and protector..
Of course the clymer lied....


Semper Fi

[Criminal Number 18F]

Gee. This report cites not one, but two Brookings "experts." No mention that Brookings is a liberal, politically partisan, Democratic Party-aligned entity.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F

[Dante3]

Clarke's credibility keeps getting lower. Like Gore and Kerry, he might be considered a pathological liar.

[SCHROLL]

speaking of which, has there been a thread posted where each and every one of Clarke's assertions in the book been compared and contrasted with what is actually known about his version of events? If so, any one have a link?

[Inyokern]

The Seattle Times is writing about this because it is a local story to them. I wonder if the national press will pick this up.

(Just kidding)

[Mo1]

At least one of the agents who helped apprehend Ressam sides with Rice's version of events.

Moreover, others involved in the Ressam case say Clarke's book contains factual errors and wrongly implies national-security officials knew of Ressam's plan to set a bomb at Los Angeles International Airport long before they actually did.

FYI ping