Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans see conflict, urge Gorelick to quit panel
Washington Times ^ | 4/15/04 | James Lakely

Posted on 04/14/2004 10:23:51 PM PDT by kattracks

Edited on 07/12/2004 4:14:30 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Pressure is growing for Jamie S. Gorelick to resign from the September 11 commission for what the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee has called "an inherent conflict of interest."

Ms. Gorelick, who served in the No. 2 position in the Clinton Justice Department under Attorney General Janet Reno, was the author of a 1995 directive to the FBI, which repeatedly has been cited in testimony as a major hindrance to antiterrorism efforts prior to the 2001 attacks.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; 911commission; clintonfailure; clintonfailures; gorelick; gorelickgate; gorelickmemo; jamesglakely; landmarklegal; marklevin; sensenbrenner; sept11
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 04/14/2004 10:23:56 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Mr. Ashcroft also suggested that Ms. Gorelick should resign from the commission

What a wimp. He should be demanding she be removed from the commission. Man, how I despise spineless Republicans.

2 posted on 04/14/2004 10:29:15 PM PDT by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
We should not act too fast on this one. We should first check with the Democrat September 11 widows. They seem to be such an important part of this investigation and I'll bet they are big on Gorelick as Gorelick is a vicious anti Bush attack dog.

Of course Gorelick is probably the worst point of failure amongst all the government personnel and by herself did most to hamper any chance of discovering all the terrorist connections in the country.

I'm sure the widows think she's just fine.

3 posted on 04/14/2004 10:30:26 PM PDT by putupjob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Write or call your Senators and Representative to tell them to get on board with Sensenbrenner.
4 posted on 04/14/2004 10:33:36 PM PDT by AlienCrossfirePlayer (proud of our brave warriors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Commission Chairman Thomas H. Kean...dismissed the calls for resignation. "Of course not. That's a silly thing," said Mr. Kean, who said Ms. Gorelick has followed the same rules as every other commission member and has, in fact, been one of the most "nonpartisan" members.

I do not have words contemptible enough for Rinos. Kean off the commission too.

5 posted on 04/14/2004 10:33:42 PM PDT by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Screw the hearings and EVERYONE involved. THIS is all you need to know about 9/11...

Clintonism failed to prevent 9/11

Osama Bin Laden caused 9/11

Political Correctness and liberalism ALLOWED 9/11!!!

6 posted on 04/14/2004 10:33:44 PM PDT by Captainpaintball (Islam is a religion of PIECES: Pieces of Israel, pieces of Europe, pieces of hostages...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Agreed. It looks like all of the Republicans involved are going to wimp out. They don't seem to understand what is at stake...the 'Rats do.

Give the media a week and they will have whipped up a firestorm demanding Ashcroft's resignation.

7 posted on 04/14/2004 10:33:51 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Actually, I was pretty impressed when he trotted out that Gorelick memo. He let its' contents speak for itself, and now the demand is growing for her resignation. Ashcroft is one of those lightning-rod guys who can't do anything right, as far as the left and the liberal media is concerned. I think he handled this exactly the right way.
8 posted on 04/14/2004 10:35:05 PM PDT by ChocChipCookie (If we had some eggs, we could have bacon and eggs if we had some bacon. --unknown Freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Ms. Gorelick was appointed to the commission by Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, South Dakota Democrat, and former House Democratic leader and presidential candidate Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri.

Should remove all doubt that her role is protecting Clinton.
9 posted on 04/14/2004 10:35:25 PM PDT by Jumpmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
I think a little more respect is in order for AG Ashcroft. He is the one who went after Gorelick yesterday.
10 posted on 04/14/2004 10:35:25 PM PDT by sruleoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
Political Correctness and liberalism ALLOWED 9/11!!!

Damn straight.

11 posted on 04/14/2004 10:35:59 PM PDT by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Congress should loudly reject the commission's "findings", whatever they are, as a product of partisan, shoddy, politics.
12 posted on 04/14/2004 10:37:09 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
You are SO wrong. Think for a minute, will ya?

Who is on defense now?

The administration does NOT want Gorelick to resign, because her participation in the 911 commission destroys their credibility. Any report they put out can be brushed aside as partisan. What will probably happen, is that by the end of the week, Gorelick will fall on her sword "for the good of the nation", to remove a Republican talking-point.

Of course, whether she stays or goes, the damage is done. The committee looks foolish and no one will take their conclusions seriously.

Rope-a-dope.
13 posted on 04/14/2004 10:39:46 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache, but not quite worthy of Condi Rice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Agreed. It looks like all of the Republicans involved are going to wimp out.

Of course they are. With the new tone in Washington, or even the old tone, does anyone really think that this commission was empaneled before the R's and D's agreed that no-one of importance in either party would get any blame?

14 posted on 04/14/2004 10:40:25 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

15 posted on 04/14/2004 10:40:28 PM PDT by nutmeg (Why vote for Bush? Imagine Commander in Chief John F’in al-Qerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
The administration does NOT want Gorelick to resign,

Mr. Ashcroft also suggested that Ms. Gorelick should resign from the commission

You were saying.....

16 posted on 04/14/2004 10:42:59 PM PDT by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Public statements don't mean jack. They want her to stay there, twisting in the wind.
17 posted on 04/14/2004 10:43:53 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache, but not quite worthy of Condi Rice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AlienCrossfirePlayer
Write or call your Senators and Representative to tell them to get on board with Sensenbrenner

Remind them about Keans comment that the "People should stay out of our business". These are public hearing and it is our business.
18 posted on 04/14/2004 10:44:56 PM PDT by boxerblues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues
"People should stay out of our business"

A lot of obvious stress and repressed anger in that statement. They got blown out of the water by Ashcroft. Whatever they say means nothing now.

19 posted on 04/14/2004 10:47:29 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache, but not quite worthy of Condi Rice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
I'm sure they are taking a lot of heat, but making a comment like that is not something I expected. The hearings are a sham and nothing more than get Bush circus
20 posted on 04/14/2004 11:01:38 PM PDT by boxerblues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson