Skip to comments.
Ex-Mossad chief: Rantisi strike is blow to Hamas
Jerusalem Post ^
| 4/17/04
Posted on 04/17/2004 2:49:01 PM PDT by LibWhacker
Former Mossad chief MK Danny Yatom (Labor) said Abdel Aziz Rantisi's killing was another blow to Hamas following the death of Shiekh Ahmed Yassin.
"Hamas' strength is its line of leaders, this is what Israel is targeting. We have no choice but to fight to the death with a group like Hamas, which wants the destruction of Israel," Yatom said.
Referring to Hamas leader Khaled Mashal, who is the de facto leader of the Islamic terrorist group and who is receiving sanctuary in Damascus, Yatom said Mashal "is the number one man in the Hamas." Yatom was the head of the Mossad during the 1997 botched assassination attempt on Mashaal in Amman, Jordan, which led to the capture of two Mossad agents and the release of Yassin from Israeli prison.
"Even when we tried to kill him in Jordan, he was their top leader. I suspect that the Hamas leadership will continue to operate from Damascus. The heads of Hamas are hiding and spending more time trying to find out who are the Israeli agents in their ranks, than trying to carry out attacks," Yatom said, adding, "Mashaal is the number one man in Hamas. He was always on the top of our list. He remains on the list."
"What happened today was an intelligence coup of the highest order," Yatom told Israel Radio.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: damascus; hamas; khaledmashal; mossad; rantisi; syria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Referring to Hamas leader Khaled Mashal, who is the de facto leader of the Islamic terrorist group and who is receiving sanctuary in Damascus . . .
Never heard of this Mashal before. And I thought "we" were getting Hamas' big cheese in taking out Yassin and Rantisi. Gotta take out Syria. Turn Israel loose, Mr. President. We can take down Iran.
To: LibWhacker
I just got the news about Rantisi. This is great policy, in my opinion--to head Hamas is certain death. That's the only effective way of dealing with terror.
2
posted on
04/17/2004 2:57:58 PM PDT
by
Agnes Heep
(Solus cum sola non cogitabuntur orare pater noster)
To: LibWhacker
Turn Israel loose, Mr. President. We can take down Iran. This thought crossed my mind just today. When are the new troops gonna be deployed?
3
posted on
04/17/2004 3:01:05 PM PDT
by
KC_for_Freedom
(Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
To: LibWhacker
If you arrest terrorists you will have the do-gooder liberals complaining because dont have room service in their prison cell ,you have stinking lawyers who place money above common sense abnd defend thse murdering buttheads, Kill them and the downside is you have these lawyers and do-gooders crying. If you call that a downside.
4
posted on
04/17/2004 3:02:20 PM PDT
by
sgtbono2002
(I aint wrong, I aint sorry , and I am probably going to do it again.)
To: KC_for_Freedom
If things don't get better, the dogs will get 'loosed'. There will be no other choice.
5
posted on
04/17/2004 3:02:46 PM PDT
by
txzman
To: Agnes Heep
I was late getting the news, too. But it made my day when I heard it! :-)
I agree with you about taking out the leaders. It's the only way to go.
Incidentally, I remember back in the 60s, the US was real strict with its anti-Castro groups. You could be anti-Casto if it suited you. But you could not under any circumstances carry out raids or any other violent act in Cuba. The reasoning was that such violence could legitimately be viewed as act of war by America.
What I want to know is what is so different now? Syria can give sanctuary to groups that attack Israel and Israel is supposed to take it? Or Syria can give sanctuary to groups that attack our own troops in Iraq, and we don't declare war Syria? Same thing with Iran. In both cases the violence is not only condoned, but is state sponsored, to boot! I hate double standards.
To: sgtbono2002
And also, now the Palestinians are going to be, like, really mad! We don't want that! They might get violent!
7
posted on
04/17/2004 3:11:44 PM PDT
by
Capriole
(DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY.)
To: LibWhacker
"Ex-Mossad chief: Rantisi strike is blow to Hamas"
With a tip of the hat to James Taranto's wonderful
Best of the Web Today, what would we do without ex-Mossad chiefs?
To: KC_for_Freedom
I don't know, but it seems like we're going to need a whole lot more troops, doesn't it? Not just a few brigades. OTOH, one good thing about it is . . . If Iran and Syria were busy fighting off invasions, they'd be too busy to meddle in Iraq!
To: LibWhacker
my crocodile is sobbing profusely...
10
posted on
04/17/2004 3:20:43 PM PDT
by
chilepepper
(The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
To: chilepepper
To: LibWhacker; yonif; veronica
The heads of Hamas are hiding and spending more time trying to find out who are the Israeli agents in their ranks, than trying to carry out attacks," Yatom said,That's the real message here, delivered to Hamas: you are riddled with our spies, that's how we located Rantisi. Now, commence devouring yourselves to discover who the spies are, (if any.)
12
posted on
04/17/2004 3:24:37 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: KC_for_Freedom
Are you planning on joining? They are stretched kinda thin about now.
13
posted on
04/17/2004 3:33:16 PM PDT
by
cksharks
To: Travis McGee
. . . commence devouring yourselves . . . Be interesting to know how many "innocent" Hamas members have been killed by Hamas just on the suspicion they were spies. Bet it's a lot, hehehehe.
To: LibWhacker
Awesome crocodile!
15
posted on
04/17/2004 3:43:42 PM PDT
by
chilepepper
(The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
To: LibWhacker
They will reach into Syria too. I wouldn't count on the overseas Hamas' leadership having sanctuary from being hunted down by the Mossad. Their should be no immunity for terrorists wherever they are. The Hamas and the PLO should be liquidated in its entirety to bring about peace in the Middle East.
16
posted on
04/17/2004 3:46:06 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: LibWhacker
I have a better solution. There's a very unhappy Kurdish minority in Northern Iran. Why don't we encourage the creation of Kurdistan? An Iranian civil war would be the best way to get rid of the Ayatollahs...
17
posted on
04/17/2004 3:48:02 PM PDT
by
Bismarck
To: Bismarck
Hmmm . . . I wonder how much Iranian territory the Kurds would demand in the creation of Kurdistan?
I've always liked the three-state solution in Iraq: Kurds in the North, Sunnis the middle, Shiites the South. These artificial unions imposed with little thought from without just don't work in that part of the world. Besides, with me, it's a divide and conquer thing. :-)
To: goldstategop
Yep . . . Gotta take out the whole state of Syria, too, imo. It's almost like Hamas is Syria's arm, which it may or may not share with the Palestinians.
To: LibWhacker
What I want to know is what is so different now? Syria can give sanctuary to groups that attack Israel and Israel is supposed to take it? Or Syria can give sanctuary to groups that attack our own troops in Iraq, and we don't declare war Syria? Same thing with Iran. In both cases the violence is not only condoned, but is state sponsored, to boot! I hate double standards. You and me both!
20
posted on
04/17/2004 4:14:13 PM PDT
by
Agnes Heep
(Solus cum sola non cogitabuntur orare pater noster)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson