To: Maximilian
What a load of crap. I'll go out on a limb and guarantee that they aren't any WMDs
There were WMD's in Iraq. Why else would we have found chem suits and chem agent antidote here.
And aren't you the least bit suspicious about this "Syria" business?
I'm not the least bit suspicious about it. Syria has refused to let us in and look around, so that raises some questions.
How about if we get the hell out of Serbia and Afghanistan and Iraq before we bring our enlightened despotism to any more backwaters.
My opinion is take the troops out and send in the nukes to finish the job.
106 posted on
04/20/2004 8:00:29 PM PDT by
armyboy
(Posting from Sustainer Army Airfield Balad, Iraq. All Gave Some...Some Gave All.)
To: armyboy
There were WMD's in Iraq. In that case we'll be showing the world the evidence any day now.
Why else would we have found chem suits and chem agent antidote here.
Perhaps because they were anticipating an attack for one country that has a known supply of chemical warfare agents?
My opinion is take the troops out and send in the nukes to finish the job.
I find it hard to believe you are serious. But this is not a joking matter. So you really support dropping nuclear weapons on the Middle East? Where precisely would you start?
To: armyboy
My opinion is take the troops out and send in the nukes to finish the job.That should have happened at 8:45 AM Eastern time on 9/12/01.
189 posted on
04/20/2004 9:06:18 PM PDT by
ASA Vet
(It will take a few more major hits here at home before we decide on war.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson