The 911 Commission stinks as does the panel members.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: BushisTheMan
Don't ask, don't tell.
2 posted on
04/26/2004 11:39:16 AM PDT by
mewzilla
To: BushisTheMan
She will not testify because she was not on the original witness list drawn up by the commission And what if Osama bin Laden himself offered to testify? Oops, he's not on the original list, sorry...
and because no other deputy-level officials have been asked to testify, a commission spokesman said.
No deputy-level officials? What about Richard Clarke?
3 posted on
04/26/2004 11:40:20 AM PDT by
dirtboy
(John Kerry - Hillary without the fat ankles and the FBI files...)
To: BushisTheMan
I see the commissioner Kerrey is scheduled to go on the "Comedy Channel" tonight.
Maybe he should bring the rest of the commission with him.
To: BushisTheMan
"We wanted to treat everybody fairly," Battle-cry of liberal scum; wasn't this Hazel O'Leary's pitiful rationale for doing away with those pesky security clearance badges at sensitive DOE sites?
5 posted on
04/26/2004 11:42:51 AM PDT by
gundog
To: BushisTheMan
In the end their "findings" won't be worth the paper they are written on.
6 posted on
04/26/2004 11:42:51 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: BushisTheMan
Ms. Gorelick already has been interviewed for the commission in private, according to Mr. Felzenberg, and there is no need for her to do so publicly. So had Condi and she was forced to testify publicly.
To: BushisTheMan
The September 11 commission rebuffed a request from Republican senators that panelist Jamie S. Gorelick testify publicly about her handling of U.S. counterterrorism efforts as President Clinton's deputy attorney general.Nice to see the Panel is all about the truth.
9 posted on
04/26/2004 11:44:42 AM PDT by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
To: BushisTheMan
Asking somebody to testify = "unfair"?!!!? what a joke.
11 posted on
04/26/2004 11:45:41 AM PDT by
Homer1
To: BushisTheMan
This panel may as well consist of Bob Woodward, Dick Clarke, Michael Moore, Al Franken, Ted Kennedy....you get the idea.
12 posted on
04/26/2004 11:48:12 AM PDT by
ride the whirlwind
(We can't let Kerry win - an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.)
To: BushisTheMan; dirtboy
"She will not testify because she was not on the original witness list drawn up by the commission"
I guess similar logic prevents them from moving Mansoor Ijaz from the original "private testimony" to the "public testimony" list...
13 posted on
04/26/2004 11:50:16 AM PDT by
pookie18
To: BushisTheMan
Do I smell a cover-up. This commission has become worthless.
16 posted on
04/26/2004 12:05:43 PM PDT by
shield
(The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
To: BushisTheMan
I can see the Title of their report now:
Lee Harvey Oswald Was The Lone Gunman
subtitle: John Wilkes Booth Killed Lincoln
(all Bush's fault)
18 posted on
04/26/2004 12:12:05 PM PDT by
Condor51
("Diplomacy without arms is like music without instruments." -- Frederick the Great)
To: BushisTheMan
This doesn't matter anyway, no one gives this panel any credibility now. Even if they do end up putting Gorelick under oath, the partisianship already sunk the panel.
20 posted on
04/26/2004 12:33:57 PM PDT by
rudypoot
To: BushisTheMan
Time for Ashcroft to bring out some more dirty laundry!!
To: BushisTheMan
"We wanted to treat everybody fairly," Vomitous is the nicest word that comes to mind here.
To: BushisTheMan
The commission had no problem calling Condi for public testimony. The commission in its current state is useless. Since Congress authorized it, Congress can change it. Try again but don't use politicians this time.
23 posted on
04/26/2004 12:36:15 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
( "The commission is either interested in the whole truth or it is not." Sen. John Cornyn)
To: BushisTheMan
Put on your tin foil hat!
Here's my take on this:
The Commssion knew about the Gorelick memo before Ashcroft "revealed" it. To protect Clinton, Albright, and Gorelick, Senator Daschle put Gorelick on the Commission so she wouldn't have to testify.
OK to remove tin foil hat now.
25 posted on
04/26/2004 12:39:17 PM PDT by
etcetera
To: BushisTheMan
She will not testify because she was not on the original witness list drawn up by the commission and because no other deputy-level officials have been asked to testify, a commission spokesman said.
BS. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz testified before the 9/11 commission.
27 posted on
04/26/2004 1:02:24 PM PDT by
elli1
To: BushisTheMan; All
Crosslinked... click the Pic:
28 posted on
04/26/2004 1:57:02 PM PDT by
backhoe
(Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the TrackBall into the Sunset...)
To: BushisTheMan; All
Everybody check Rush's website later today for his take on the real issue with the 1995 Gorelick memo. I was only half listening, but Rush mentioned something about why Gorelick really wrote her memo .. to KEEP INFORMATION ABOUT CLINTON'S CAMPAIGN FUNDS FROM THE CHINESE from becoming part of the criminal investigation.
NOW .. THIS IS A BOMBSHELL!!
29 posted on
04/26/2004 2:01:54 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson