Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nader on the 2000 Election
votenader.com ^

Posted on 05/04/2004 3:22:32 PM PDT by K1avg

Q: Did Ralph cost Al Gore the election in 2000?

A: No.

Al Gore won the election in 2000.

George W. Bush cost Al Gore the election.

No one is entitled to votes, they must be earned.

To say someone is a "spoiler" is to relegate all third-party and independent candidates to second class citizenship. American does not belong to two parties.

The Constitution does not mention parties.

This country had a rich history of third parties.

George W. Bush’s recount strategy in Florida cost Gore the election.

The deceptive butterfly ballot, which Democratic officials approved, cost Al Gore the election.

Katherine Harris-style purging of tens of thousands of non ex-felons from the voter roles cost the election.

A 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court stop of the recount cost Gore the election. (See Jeffrey Toobin’s book Too Close to Call).

Playing the "what if" game, Gore cost Gore the election in Tennessee, Arkansas, and each of the presidential debates.

Buchanan cost Bush four states (Oregon, Iowa, Wisconsin, and New Mexico).

Except for brief, progressive moments, such as at the convention, which helped his polls, Gore ran the usual, lackluster corporate Democratic campaign.

And they did. They voted for Bush, including more than 250,000 self-identified Democrats in Florida.

Moreover, a Democratic exit poll showed that Ralph’s votes came 25% from Republicans, 38% from Democrats, and the rest were nonvoters who would have only voted for Ralph.

In other words, more than sixty percent of Ralph’s voters would NOT have voted for Gore.

In New Hampshire, exit polls showed that Ralph "took more votes" from Republicans than Democrats, by a 2 to 1 margin.

CNN’s polling data said that if neither Nader nor Buchanan had run, Bush would have beat Gore 48 to 47 percent, with 4 percent who voted not voting.

For the last three years Democrats and media pundits have been smearing Ralph Nader and the Greens — oblivious to the facts — looking for a scapegoat for the failures of their own party and its candidates.

It is not the job of third-party or Independent candidates to make sure either of the two major parties wins.

That would be like asking a new start-up to make sure Microsoft or Apple has more market share.

Moreover, there are 100 million people in this country who do not vote. There are plenty of nonvoters for all candidates to attract.

Electoral votes are not a zero-sum game.

Historically, third parties and Independents move very important agendas.

(Excerpt) Read more at votenader.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: 2000; nader
Everyone's favorite third-party candidate opines on why "It's not my fault."

Beautiful example of shoddy stream of consciousness in my opinion.

Wading through Ralph's site is like wading through raw sewage. Another thread coming on Ralph's latest blog entry: "Dear Conservatives Upset With the Policies of the Bush Administration:" Shudder...

1 posted on 05/04/2004 3:22:33 PM PDT by K1avg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: K1avg
Al Gore won the election in 2000.

Really, then why isn't his fat ass in the White House?

2 posted on 05/04/2004 3:26:26 PM PDT by petercooper (We did not have to prove Saddam had WMD, he had to prove he didn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petercooper
dems will say that Bush stole it; or jugdes are the ones who put him in power. it doesnt matter, they will hear what they want to hear
3 posted on 05/04/2004 3:37:17 PM PDT by zahal724
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: K1avg
Liberals always use the 5-4 stop the count .. but they never recognize the 7-2 illegal recounting. Amazing. They pick and choose whichever laws suit them.
4 posted on 05/04/2004 4:13:44 PM PDT by CyberAnt (The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K1avg
Why are you trolling the nader site at all?

That's two posts from you now.
5 posted on 05/04/2004 4:13:58 PM PDT by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K1avg
George W. Bush cost Al Gore the election.

Al Gore cost Al Gore the election.

6 posted on 05/04/2004 5:04:33 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (...and Freedom tastes of Reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson