Posted on 05/05/2004 11:24:24 AM PDT by Kaslin
GQ Magazine, in it's latest issue, details Sec. of State Colin Powell's frustration with the Bush administration, his battles with the Pentagon, his 'real' relationship with Vice President Dick Cheney, and whether he'll return for a second term.
The magazine issued a press release saying the following:
Secretary of State Colin Powell is exhausted, frustrated, and bitter, uncomfortable with President George W. Bush's agenda, and fatigued from his battles with the Pentagon, reports GQ magazine writer-at-large Wil S. Hylton in the June 2004 issue of GQ magazine. Hylton's exclusive article, "Casualty of War," in which he talks with Powell and his closest friends and colleagues openly and on the record, is available online at http://www.gq.com.
Highlights from the article include:
• Powell's chief of staff, Larry Wilkerson, on whether Powell will return for a second term: "He's tired. Mentally and physically. And if the president were to ask him to stay on -- if the president is re-elected and the president were to ask him to stay on, he might for a transitional period, but I don't think he'd want to do another four years."
• Powell's mentor from the National War College, Harlan Ullman on Powell's discomfort with the Bush team: "This is, in many ways, the most ideological administration Powell's ever had to work for. Not only is it very ideological, but they have a vision. And I think Powell is inherently uncomfortable with grand visions like that ... There's an ideological core to Bush, and I think it's hard for Powell to penetrate that."
• Ullman on Powell's relationship with Vice President Dick Cheney: "I can tell you firsthand that there is a tremendous barrier between Cheney and Powell, and there has been for a long time ... It's like McCain saying that his relations with the president are 'congenial,' meaning McCain doesn't tell the president to go f*ck himself every time."
• Ullman on National Security Advisor's Condoleeza Rice's comments that Powell and Cheney are "on more than speaking terms," and that they're "very friendly": "Condi's a jerk."
• Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage on Powell's presentation pre-war presentation before the U.N.: "It's a source of great distress for the secretary."
Rice insists that Powell had not been sent to the U.N. per se, because he was the only one who could have made the speech, and says: "There's really nobody else that can do it ... Everybody said it would have to be Colin ... We wanted to have enough of a profile. It was an important presentation. So we wanted to have enough profile."
Hylton reports that Rice described Powell as enthusiastic about the presentation, spending four days and nights at CIA headquarters and scouring the evidence against Saddam Hussein for ways to punch it up. She tells Hylton: "He wanted to be sure that we put in the best, strongest aerials we had, both from the point of view of the ones that were best documented but also the ones that were going to be punchiest."
But Armitage and Wilkerson describe Powell's four-day immersion at the CIA in very different terms -- not punching up the evidence but frantically scouring it for mistakes and faulty intelligence.
Armitage on Powell's preparation for his U.N. presentation: "Four days! And three nights! The secretary is a man of honor! He values being credible. To be credible, you have to be able to stand behind what you say. That's why he fieldstripped it."
Armitage refers to the process, common in Vietnam, of tearing up smoked cigarettes so they will decompose quickly and leave no trace for the enemy. "On the last day and night [at the CIA], the secretary called me, and he said, 'I need a little extra reinforcement.' So I went out there and spent Sunday and Saturday night with him. He needed someone. He was the voice throwing everything out, and he wanted another loud voice at the table."
Wilkerson describes those four days at the CIA as a battle, with Powell's team scrambling in the final hours to save the general from humiliation: "I was down at the agency as his task-force leader, and we fought tooth and nail with other members of the administration to scrub it and get the crap out."
Wilkerson on the neocons: "I make no bones about it. I have some reservations about people who have never been in the face of battle, so to speak, who are making cavalier decisions about sending men and women out to die.
"A person who comes immedately to mind in that regard is Richard Perle, who, thank God, tendered his resignation and no longer will be even a semioffcial person in this administration.
"Richard Perle's cavalier remarks about doing this or doing that with regard to military force always, always troubled me. Because it just showed me that he didn't have the appreciation, for example, that Colin Powell has for what it means ... I call them utopians ... I don't care whether utopians are Vladimir Lenin in a sealed train going to Moscow or Paul Wolfowitz.
"Utopians, I don't like. You're never going to bring utopia, and you're going to hurt a lot of people in the process of trying to do it."
Wilkerson on using sanctions against Cuba: "Dumbest policy on the face of the earth. It's crazy."
Wil S. Hylton's article, "Casualty of War," is available online at http://www.gq.com, and will be available on newsstands in New York and Los Angeles on May 18, and nationwide on May 25. GQ is the leading men's general-interest magazine and part of Conde Nast Publications, Inc.
Who I do see leaving is our favorite person at the UN......Kofi!!
In that case we had better start praying fervently that our other "favorite person" (Clinton) isn't installed there. The curse of the US could become the curse of the world.
What a shocker -- don't most 2-term Presidents have a lot of turnover early in their second term? This is kind of like predicting that the sun will rise in the east tomorrow.
UN rules prohibit the Secretary General from coming from one of the five countries who are permanent members of the Security Council.
If he does opt out in the event of the Presidents re-election, I say good.
FMCDH
Not me.
FMCDH
Well this is the first time I've seen 'fieldstripping' defined in this way. Certainly suites the writer's premise, if nothing else.
9-11 was to tell us of the imminent danger throughout the world. The UN/Iraq violations fiasco was to enlighten us as to the Power and Money and Self-interest at the top of the UN (Kofi).
You know the left likes to speculate. I say let them. We can laugh when they get aggs splattered all over their faces
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.