[vetvetdoug]

Think about it, the historians are the ones that came out publicly against the Clinton Impeachment. "Historians" is becoming a moniker for leftist idiots.

[COEXERJ145]

Think about it, the historians are the ones that came out publicly against the Clinton Impeachment. "Historians" is becoming a moniker for leftist idiots.

Not this historian.

[VOA]

Think about it, the historians are the ones that came out publicly against the Clinton Impeachment.

What's scary is that it's not just history professors thus affected.
I remember John McLauglin interviewing a molecular biology prof (Oxford or Cambridge)
who did a lot of the work on the Thomas Jefferson fatherhood of slave-children
questions.
McLaughlin just about had to twist the guy's arm to admit the science didn't PROVE
Th. Jefferson did the deed...it just failed to exclude him from the potential pool of fathers.

But this same molecular biologist was admanant that Thomas Jefferson had most
certainly had fathered the children "because of the science and the history".
In-freakin'-credible.

[VOA]

Think about it, the historians are the ones that came out publicly against the Clinton Impeachment.

What's scary is that it's not just history professors thus affected.
I remember John McLauglin interviewing a molecular biology prof (Oxford or Cambridge)
who did a lot of the work on the Thomas Jefferson fatherhood of slave-children
questions.
McLaughlin just about had to twist the guy's arm to admit the science didn't PROVE
Th. Jefferson did the deed...it just failed to exclude him from the potential pool of fathers.

But this same molecular biologist was admanant that Thomas Jefferson had most
certainly had fathered the children "because of the science and the history".
In-freakin'-credible.