Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How is the war really going? [Hugh Hewitt advises Rumsfeld to return to using embedded reporters]
www.worldnetdaily.com ^ | May 5, 2004 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 05/07/2004 12:40:11 PM PDT by RonDog

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38351

Wednesday, May 5, 2004



How is the war really going?

Posted: May 5, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Hugh Hewitt


© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
A year after the victory in the second Iraq War, the third Iraq War isn't going so well. Or if it is, the American public isn't hearing about it. Which is why Secretary Rumsfeld needs to send one of his famed "snowflake" memos (because they come in flurries) to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The subject: Keeping the American people in the loop.

There is a solid majority of American public opinion behind the war effort, despite the best efforts of the Left and the elite media to diminish public support for the ongoing contest for this crucial battleground in the larger War on Terror. There is no evidence of malaise among the ordinary Americans who understand the stakes and provide the political support for the war.

But there are questions – questions which are not being asked and answered as they were during the course of last year's major combat operations.

It is difficult to figure out what the strategy in Fallujah is, to name the biggest source of confusion, or to assign a name to the decision to empower one of Saddam's old generals to assist in the pacification of the city. Have the Marines withdrawn? If not, what was all the muttering about? Are there insurgents inside Fallujah or not?

In the south, where is al Sadr and how big is his force? Which elements of the Army are engaged with those militias? Are there other militias of equal or greater threat?

How many troops are presently in Iraq, and how many of those are front-line vs. support troops? What's the rotation schedule, and what's the expectation for one year and two years from now?

In the campaign to convert a totalitarian state to a functioning democracy, who's got the lead oar on building the new Iraqi security services and Army? Who is training the police? Which Iraqi leaders have charisma, talent and a hope of standing up to the Saddam remnants and the Iranian-backed extremists? Is Syria still importing gunmen to shoot at our troops?

My guess is that most of these questions have been answered in one way or another by one spokesman or another, but the delivery of the information has become fractured, and the news – good as well as bad – isn't getting through as it was last year. Maintaining public support for the war means maintaining the information flow to the public.

Some suggestions:

Begin each week with an overview briefing of 10 minutes or less – delivered by Gen. Pace or any of the Pentagon's experienced and trusted voices – on the state of the effort in Iraq. Such a scheduled brief becomes easy to rebroadcast on shows such as mine or to transcribe and post on any number of websites.

Then take questions at the same time on Monday and every day of the week. Supplement the daily brief with statements by Secretary Rumsfeld and other senior officials as appropriate, but do so with plenty of advance notice and easy to access rebroadcasts over the Web. Get Central Command on a similar schedule.

The public information operation run by Ambassador Bremer's team appears to be non-existent, perhaps owing to the press of business, but that's not what the public cares about anyway. They want to know how the war is going, and are much less concerned with the structure of the peace. Do-gooders can wring their hands over this, but it is the situation the troops find themselves in that holds the interest of the public. The administration should stop trying to downplay the combat and instead respect the desire of the public to be fully informed of all the details of the fighting.

Put the embedded reporters back with the units and thus remove the filter that is obstructing the news. There is a reason why the Belmont Club and Command Post and other blogs are seeing their traffic skyrocket: They are providing overviews and analysis of the fighting. The Pentagon needs to match the public's interest with the information it has available to it.


Related offer:

Hugh Hewitt's new book is here! "In, But Not Of" takes a hard look at Christian ambition and influence and provides readers with valuable insights, wisdom, personal experiences and advice on how to rise in the world and achieve the kind of radical success that honors God. Autographed copies now available in ShopNetDaily!


Hugh Hewitt is an author, television commentator and syndicated talk-show host of the Salem Radio Network's Hugh Hewitt Show, heard in over 40 markets around the country.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: embeddedreporters; hughhewitt; iraq

1 posted on 05/07/2004 12:40:11 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
ping
2 posted on 05/07/2004 12:40:55 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; ALOHA RONNIE; DLfromthedesert; PatiPie; flamefront; onyx; SMEDLEYBUTLER; Irma; ...
"...My guess is that most of these questions have been answered in one way or another by one spokesman or another, but the delivery of the information has become fractured, and the news – good as well as bad – isn't getting through as it was last year.

Maintaining public support for the war means maintaining the information flow to the public." - Hugh Hewitt

.


www.HughHewitt.com
PING!

If you listen to Hugh Hewitt,
or read his WorldNetDaily articles,
or his commentary at the Weekly Standard,
then this PING list is for YOU!

Please post your comments, and BUMP!

(If you want OFF - or ON - my "Hugh Hewitt PING list" - please let me know)

3 posted on 05/07/2004 12:43:00 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
Thats not a half bad idea except for the fact that editors still get final say. I remember watching testimony of BBC reporters late one night. They claimed that their stories were so heavilly edited to an anti war stance that they didn't recognize them.
4 posted on 05/07/2004 12:48:53 PM PDT by cripplecreek (you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
A hugh Hugh Hewitt BUMP TO THE TOP!!!
5 posted on 05/07/2004 1:03:48 PM PDT by upchuck (Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm. - W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
On Gary McNamara's talk show on WFAA 820, a soldier called in. He complained that the U.S. is getting a totally different view of the war than the view he sees in dealing with the Iraqis.

He relayed his participation in helping them set up city councils, and representatives and the wonder of watching a democracy being created.

He also indicated that in a trip into work, they came upon an Iraqi lying in the road having been shot twice and dumped in the road during a theft of his car. His group assisted him and called in support from a medic returning from assignment by helicopter. The medic treated the man and they saved his life.

He advised it was so ironic that this very man became one of the city council representatives Iraqis designated.

McNamara mentioned having him provide updates from Iraq periodically. This is what is needed - direct reports from our military men of what they are involved in.

Who needs the liberal media to screen our information? This is a free society. If we can post lewd pictures that inflame the world's hatred of America and damage our men and women fighting, we can air reports from those men and women on the ground.

Let the liberal media try and stop us.
6 posted on 05/07/2004 1:07:11 PM PDT by ClancyJ (It's just not safe to vote Democratic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
I would suggest embedding Dan Rather, Peter Jennings, and the entire cast of CNN, CNBC and MSNBC (especially Hardball man)in the Abu Ghraib to report --first-hand-- on prison abuse.

Bring on the trophy snaps.
7 posted on 05/07/2004 1:12:52 PM PDT by MN_Mike (In Pelosi, Kerry and the Blow Fish (Kennedy) We Mis-Trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson