To: Aquinasfan; E Rocc
The claim by "cultural conservatives" that morals are somehow universal is beyond being just plain wrong,...
Some moral values are consistent among cultures, such as not committing murder, theft, assault, or fraud. They can better be described as "ethics".
"Moral" considerations involving eating, drinking, smoking, entertainment, attire, consensual sex, etc. vary from culture to culture.
In a free nation, it's best for government to butt out of those.
-Eric
______________________________________
Aquinasfan wrote:
This looks like a contradiction to me.
All you've done is called "morals," "ethics." In reality, there is no difference.
__________________________________________
You ignored his explanation of his view on ethics vs morals.
-- Hardly an ethical way to make a rebuttal, is it?
258 posted on
05/19/2004 9:57:33 AM PDT by
tpaine
(The line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. -- A. Solzhenitsyn)
To: tpaine
You ignored his explanation of his view on ethics vs morals. -- Hardly an ethical way to make a rebuttal, is it? It's impossible to rebut a contradictory statement.
If you think you know what his point is, rephrase it, and I'll reply to it if I have time.
299 posted on
05/19/2004 11:00:29 AM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: tpaine; Aquinasfan; E Rocc
Hardly an ethical way to make a rebuttal, is it?Certainly not an immoral method.
Erocc does not share the concept of morality which was prevalent in this country in 1954.
He's part of the problem PJB discusses.
329 posted on
05/19/2004 12:03:58 PM PDT by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson